MP High Court Extends Interim Protection Granted To Viral Kumbh Mela Star & Husband In FIR Alleging Child Marriage

Jayanti Pahwa

5 Aug 2026 5:55 PM IST

  • POCSO Act | Taking 6-Year-Old Child To A Secluded room, Placing Her On Ones Lap & Rubbing Her Thigh Signals Sexual Intention: MP High Court

    Image by: Shubha Patidar

    Listen to this Article

    The Madhya Pradesh High Court on Tuesday directed the continuation of interim protection granted to the viral Kumbh Mela star and her husband, in their petition alleging that her birth records were manipulated to falsely portray her as a minor and criminalise her interfaith marriage.

    The couple has also sought restoration of her original birth certificate and an independent investigation into the alleged forgery of government records.

    The bench of Justice Gajendra Singh listed the matter for August 17, 2026.

    Earlier, on July 13, 2026, the High Court had granted interim protection against coercive action in the FIR registered over allegations of juvenile marriage.

    The star had risen to national fame during the Maha Kumbh celebrations last year, after videos of her selling rudraksha garlands at the mela circulated widely on social media. Later, she went to Kerala for a shoot where she met her husband and got married in March 2026.

    However, a controversy arose when the National Commissioner for Scheduled Tribes claimed that the star was a minor, only aged 16 years, at the time of the marriage. They alleged that a forged birth certificate was used to facilitate the wedding. Thus, a case under the POCSO Act was registered against the husband.

    Their petition claimed that the star's father conspired to manipulate her birth records to criminalise her interfaith marriage and by lodging an FIR for kidnapping.

    Subsequently, the couple approached the Kerala High Court seeking a stay on the arrest of the couple, which was granted. The High Court later granted transit bail to the husband to seek bail before the competent court in MP.

    Thus, the husband approached the MP Court seeking anticipatory bail, which was denied, observing that the dispute over the wife's date of birth is a subject matter of trial and cannot be considered in the husband's anticipatory bail hearing.

    The Kerala High Court vacated its interim order granting police protection after being informed that the police were unable to trace or locate the petitioner based on the contact number or the address provided.
    Recently, the Kerala High Court directed the State government to ensure that the viral Kumbh Mela star is not taken out of the jurisdictional limits of Cochin city against her will and without its further orders.

    Case Title: MB v State of Madhya Pradesh WP No. 18924 of 2026

    For Petitioners: Senior Advocate Vivek Krishna Tankh with Advocate Jerry Lopes

    For State: Additional Advocate General Rahul Sethi with Government Advocate Sunit Kapoor

    Jayanti Pahwa

    Jayanti Pahwa

    Jayanti Pahwa is a Correspondent with LiveLaw, covering the Madhya Pradesh High Court

    Next Story