Punjab & Haryana High Court Monthly Digest: September 2025

Nominal Index [Citations 353-385 ]Suraj Kumar v. State of Punjab and others 2025 LiveLaw (PH) 353 Amrinder Singh & Ors v. IT Department & Ors 2025 LiveLaw (PH) 354 Kuldeep v. State of Haryana and others 2025 LiveLaw (PH) 355 Hardik Ahluwalia v. Gaurav Yadav, IPS and others 2025 LiveLaw (PH) 356 DIPESH JAIN v. STATE OF PUNJAB 2025 LiveLaw (PH) 357 NAVPREET KAUR v. UOI & Ors 2025 LiveLaw (PH) 358 Hari Ram and others v State of Haryana & Ors 2025 LiveLaw (PH) 359 ONKAR SINGH @ OMKAR AND OTHERS v. MAHANT SITARAM DASS 2025 LiveLaw (PH) 360DHARAM SINGH CHHOKER v. DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT AND OTHERS 2025 LiveLaw (PH) 361 SUNIL MOHITE v. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS 2025 LiveLaw (PH) 362ANAND v. STATE OF HARYANA 2025 LiveLaw (PH) 363 XXX v. XXX 2025 LiveLaw (PH) 364 XXX v. State of Punjab 2025 LiveLaw (PH) 365 Ashish Kumar v. State of Punjab 2025 LiveLaw (PH) 366 XXX v. XXX 2025 LiveLaw (PH) 367 DR. SHIVA SHARMA v. HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AND ANOTHER 2025 LiveLaw (PH) 368 GURMEET SINGH v. STATE OF HARYANA 2025 LiveLaw (PH) 369 VINOD KUMAR V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS 2025 LiveLaw (PH) 370 Sumit Sharma and another v. State of Haryana 2025 LiveLaw (PH) 371 Amritpal Singh v. Union Territory Chandigarh 2025 LiveLaw (PH) 372 XXX v. XXXX 2025 LiveLaw (PH) 373 Gulshan Babbar v. Lalit Goyal and another 2025 LiveLaw (PH) 374XXXXX v. XXXX 2025 LiveLaw (PH) 375Kimti Lal @ Kimti Lal Bhagat v. State of Punjab and others 2025 LiveLaw (PH) 376 RUSHIL JINDAL v. PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AND OTHERS 2025 LiveLaw (PH) 377XXX v XXX 2025 LiveLaw (PH) 378 HARBHAJAN SINGH AND OTHERS v. BHAKRA BEAS MANAGEMENT BOARD AND OTHERS 2025 LiveLaw (PH) 379 XXXXX v. XXXX 2025 LiveLaw (PH) 380 M/s Coromandel International Limited v. Shri Ambica Sales Corporation 2025 LiveLaw (PH) 381Jagdish Masih and another v. The State of Punjab and others 2025 LiveLaw (PH) 382KRISHAN KUMAR @ KRISHAN LAL v. STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. 2025 LiveLaw (PH) 383 MANPREET ALIAS MANI v. STATE OF PUNJAB 2025 LiveLaw (PH) 384Ranjit Singh v. State of Punjab and others 2025 LiveLaw (PH) 385ReportsMagistrate Can Grant Bail When Closure Report Is Filed Even If Earlier Plea Is Rejected By HC: Punjab & Haryana High CourtTitle: Suraj Kumar v. State of Punjab and othersCitation: 2025 LiveLaw (PH) 353The Punjab and Haryana High Court has held that a Magistrate is empowered to grant bail to an accused when a closure report is filed by the police, even if a previous bail plea was rejected by the High Court or the Session Court.These observations were made while making an interim-bail absolute to an accused arrested for stealing a bicycle and a pair of shoes.ED Can Inspect Court Files, Documents Attached In Complaint Filed By Income Tax Dept: Punjab & Haryana High CourtTitle: Amrinder Singh & Ors v. IT Department & OrsCitation: 2025 LiveLaw (PH) 354The Punjab & Haryana High Court has said that Enforcement Directorate (ED) can inspect documents filed before the Court with complaint lodged by the Income Tax ( I.T.) Department.The complaint was filed by the I.T. Department against the petitioners under Section 277 of the Income Tax Act, read with the provisions of the IPC, wherein information in the form of master sheets originally received in Paris, France, by the authority of the Foreign Tax was placed on record.'Public Employment Opportunities Are Scarce, Recruitment Must Be Sacrosanct': P&H High Court Voids Appointment Based On Forged DocsTitle: Kuldeep v. State of Haryana and othersCitation: 2025 LiveLaw (PH) 355The Punjab and Haryana High Court has held that recruitment in public employment must remain sacrosanct, declaring that an appointment obtained on the basis of forged documents is “void ab initio”.10 years after being appointed as Assistant Lineman, the authorities found that documents submitted were forged.Can't Hold Online Platforms Liable For Contempt Over Songs Glorifying Liqour, Violence Due To Non-Compliance With Reet Mohinder Order: P&H HCTitle: Hardik Ahluwalia v. Gaurav Yadav, IPS and othersCitation: 2025 LiveLaw (PH) 356In a recent clarification, the Punjab and Haryana High Court held that online platforms such as YouTube, Apple Music, Spotify, and others cannot be held in contempt for hosting songs that glorify violence or promote liquor, under the scope of the directions issued in the Reet Mohinder Singh v. State of Punjab & Ors. case.Bail Can't Be Cancelled Merely Because Accused Sought Exemption From Appearance On Few Hearing Dates: Punjab & Haryana High CourtTitle: DIPESH JAIN v. STATE OF PUNJABCitation: 2025 LiveLaw (PH) 357The Punjab & Haryana High Court has held that seeking exemption from appearance on a few hearing dates during trial, by itself, does not justify cancellation of bail granted to an accused.Justice Yashvir Singh Rathor said, "Merely, because petitioner had sought exemption on three dates out of six dates of hearing, it cannot be inferred that he had wilfully absented himself or was hampering the trial. The bail...

Punjab & Haryana High Court Monthly Digest: September 2025

LIVELAW NEWS NETWORK

Tags