Calcutta High Court Monthly Digest: March 2022 [Citations: 61 To 101]

Nominal Index Nasrin Khatun v. The State of West Bengal & Ors 2022 LiveLaw (Cal) 61Ashok Kumar Sureka v. Assistant Commissioner State Tax, Durgapur Range, Government of West Bengal 2022 LiveLaw (Cal) 62Zia Sharif Hussain @ Tushar Subash Roy 2022 LiveLaw (Cal) 63Habibur Rahaman v. State of West Bengal 2022 LiveLaw (Cal) 64Budhin Soren v. State of West Bengal 2022 LiveLaw (Cal) 65Sashi Jain @ Shashi Jain v. Sandip Sarka 2022 LiveLaw (Cal) 66Saptaparna Ray v. District Magistrate and Collector, North 24 Parganas and others 2022 LiveLaw (Cal) 67Latika Ghosh v. The Commercial Tax Officer/Assistant Commissioner, West Bengal Goods & Service Tax, Raiganj Charge & ors 2022 LiveLaw (Cal) 68Setab Uddin & Ors v. The State of West Bengal & Ors 2022 LiveLaw (Cal) 69Creative Museum Designers v. Income Tax Officer, Exemptions, Ward-1(1), Kolkata 2022 LiveLaw (Cal) 70Dharanidhar Ghosh Vs. Union of India 2022 LiveLaw (Cal) 71Unisource Hydro Carbon Services Private Limited Versus Union of India 2022 LiveLaw (Cal) 72Sankar Mondal v. Swapan Debnath & Ors 2022 LiveLaw (Cal) 73Piyali Tewari Dey v. Baidyanath Dey & Ors 2022 LiveLaw (Cal) 74Ashlesh Biradar v. State of West Bengal 2022 LiveLaw (Cal) 75In the goods of Mahesh Kumar Agarwal and Anr. v. Meena Agarwal and Ors 2022 LiveLaw (Cal) 76Tushar Kanti Das v. Kajal Saha 2022 LiveLaw (Cal) 77 Anubrata Mondal v. Union of India & Ors 2022 LiveLaw (Cal) 78In Re : Bhajagobinda Roy alias Bhajan Roy 2022 LiveLaw (Cal) 79Galaxy Mechanical Engineering Equipments Private Limited Versus Assistant Commissioner 2022 LiveLaw (Cal) 80Concast Steel and Power Limited v. Sarat Chatterjee and Co 2022 LiveLaw (Cal) 81Sariful Sk. & Anr v. The State of West Bengal 2022 LiveLaw (Cal) 82Anindya Sundar Das v. Union of India and other connected matters 2022 LiveLaw (Cal) 83Precious Trade Link Private Limited Versus Assistant Commissioner of State Tax 2022 LiveLaw (Cal) 84Alpine Distilleries Pvt. Ltd v. The State of West Bengal and others 2022 LiveLaw (Cal) 85Ajoy Kumar Singhania v. The State of West Bengal & Ors 2022 LiveLaw (Cal) 86Naimuddin Laskar @ Naim v. The State of West Bengal 2022 LiveLaw (Cal) 87Kabita Mondal (Gayen) v. West Bengal State Electricity Distribution Co. Ltd. and others 2022 LiveLaw (Cal) 88Kamal Nath v. The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Kolkata 2022 LiveLaw (Cal) 89The Court on its own Motion In re: The Brutal Incident of Bogtui Village, Rampurhat, Birbhum 2022 LiveLaw (Cal) 90Malancha Mohinta v. Dipak Mohinta 2022 LiveLaw (Cal) 91Ram Sevak Lohar v. State 2022 LiveLaw (Cal) 92Dr. Kausik Paul v. Seacom Skills University and Others 2022 LiveLaw (Cal) 93Anubrata Mondal v. Union of India & Ors 2022 LiveLaw (Cal) 94Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited v. Optimal Power Synergy Ltd 2022 LiveLaw (Cal) 95In Re : Guddu Mondal @ Guddu Ali Mondal & Anr 2022 LiveLaw (Cal) 96Dr. Santi Prasad Sinha v. Md. Abdul Gani Ansari and others 2022 LiveLaw (Cal) 97Abu Fazel Fakir & Ors v. The State of West Bengal 2022 LiveLaw (Cal) 98Md. Abdul Gani Ansari v. State of West Bengal & Ors. 2022 LiveLaw (Cal) 99Rajesh K.V. @ Rajesh Kaleerakath Venugopal v. Visva-Bharati & Ors 2022 LiveLaw (Cal) 100Sabitri Bhunya v. The State of West Bengal and Others 2022 LiveLaw (Cal) 101Orders/Judgments 1. SLST Recruitment Scam | Calcutta High Court Orders CBI Probe Into Alleged Illegal Appointment Of Asst. Teachers In WBCase Title: Nasrin Khatun v. The State of West Bengal & OrsCase Citation: 2022 LiveLaw (Cal) 61The Calcutta High Court directed the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) to probe into the alleged illegal appointment of assistant teachers pertaining to the West Bengal State Level Selection Test (SLST) for Class 9 and Class 10 teachers. The Court had earlier ordered the cancellation of appointment of six assistant teachers in the Murshidabad district after noting that they had been illegally appointed pursuant to the illegal recommendation of the West Bengal School Service Commission (WBSSC). Justice Abhijit Gangopadhyay on Monday handed over the investigation into the matter to the CBI and directed that the probe should be conducted under the supervision of an officer not below the rank of a Joint Director and accordingly observed, "I direct the Director, Central Bureau of Investigation to constitute a committee, headed by an officer not below the rank of a Joint Director, with officers not below the rank of DIG to initiate the enquiry. It is expected that no person connected with the matter will be left out of this enquiry." Opining that the police authorities are controlled by the State machinery and that an independent agency is required to impartially probe into the allegations, the Court further noted, "It is not that, I do not have any confidence upon the Police of this State. But the Police is controlled by the State and in effect they are chained by orders from different quarters. Otherwise I have the belief that the Kolkata Police or the Police of the State is fully capable to inquire into the...

Calcutta High Court Monthly Digest: March 2022 [Citations: 61 To 101]

Aaratrika Bhaumik

Tags