Karnataka High Court Weekly Round-Up: June 27 To July 3, 2022

Nominal Index: NELSON RAJ v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA. 2022 LiveLaw 229 Kavitha v. State of Karnataka. 2022 LiveLaw (Kar) 230 Mrs Leena Rakesh v Bureau of Immigration Ministry of Home Affairs. 2022 LiveLaw (Kar) 231 YUSUB S/O MOHAMUSAB SANADI v THE STATE OF KARNATAKA. 2022 LiveLaw (Kar) 232 SUPRIT ISHWAR DIVATE v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA. 2022 LiveLaw (Kar) 233 M.AJITHKUMAR v THE STATE BY FOOD INSPECTOR, KOPPA. 2022 LiveLaw (Kar) 234 XXX v. STATE OF KARNATAKA. 2022 LiveLaw (Kar) 235 SHIVANAND LAXMAN ANCHI v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA. 2022 LiveLaw (Kar) 236K LAKSHMAIAH REDDY v. V ANIL REDDY & others. 2022 LiveLaw (Kar) 237 DADA S/O BALU ROOGE v. APPASAHEB S/O KIRAN KESTE. 2022 LiveLaw (Kar) 238 Sudarshan Ramesh v. Union Of India. 2022 LiveLaw (Kar) 239 THE UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES v. DR. DIGAMBARAPPA, & others. 2022 LiveLaw (Kar) 240 Sadik Khan @Sadik v State of Karnataka. 2022 LiveLaw (Kar) 241 Judgments/Reports 1. Courts Duty Bound To Consider All Contentions Raised By Parties While Deciding Bail Applications: Karnataka High Court Case Title: NELSON RAJ v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA Case No: CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.336 OF 2022 C/W CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.267 OF 2022 & CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.337 OF 2022. Citation: 2022 LiveLaw 229 The Karnataka High Court has said that courts are bound to take into consideration all the contentions raised by the parties while hearing a bail petition filed before it and then pass an appropriate order. 2. Karnataka High Court Acquits Woman Accused Of Murdering Her Two Months Old Child By Throwing In River Case Title: Kavitha v. State of Karnataka Case No: CRIMINAL APPEAL No.1372 OF 2017 Citation: 2022 LiveLaw (Kar) 230 The Karnataka High Court recently set aside the conviction and sentence of life imprisonment imposed on a woman for allegedly causing the death of her two months old girl-child, who was suffering from epilepsy and some respiratory problems, by throwing her into a river. 3. Bank Can't Seek Issuance Of 'Look Out Circular' For Recovery Of Dues Unless Economic Interest Of Country Is Involved: Karnataka High Court Case Title: Mrs Leena Rakesh v Bureau of Immigration Ministry of Home Affairs. Case No: WP 11213/2022 Citation: 2022 LiveLaw (Kar) 231 The Karnataka High Court has said the request for issuance of a Look out Circular (LOC) or preventing a person (defaulter of loan) from travelling abroad cannot be a mode of recovery of dues by a bank, unless there is an element of fraud and economic interest of the country is involved. 4. Karnataka High Court Orders ₹10 Lakh Compensation For Death Of 2-Yr-Old In Stray Dog Attack Case Title: YUSUB S/O MOHAMUSAB SANADI v THE STATE OF KARNATAKA Case No: WRIT PETITION NO. 110352 OF 2019 Citation: 2022 LiveLaw (Kar) 232 The Karnataka High Court has held that there is a statutory obligation which has been imposed upon the local municipal authorities to safeguard the human beings cohabitating within their jurisdiction, from the danger of any stray dogs and/or any attack by such stray dogs. 5. Reasons For Handcuffing Accused Must Be Recorded In Case Diary: Karnataka High Court Awards 2 Lakh Compensation To Law Student Case Title: SUPRIT ISHWAR DIVATE v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA Case No: WRIT PETITION NO. 115362 OF 2019 Citation: 2022 LiveLaw (Kar) 233 The Karnataka High Court has held that an accused who is arrested can normally not be handcuffed. It is only under "extreme circumstances", for instance where there is possibility of the accused/ under trial prisoner escaping custody or causing harm to himself or causing harm to others, that handcuffing of an accused can be resorted to. 6. Accused Can't Be Convicted For Charge Which Is Not Framed By Trial Court: Karnataka High Court Case Title: M.AJITHKUMAR v THE STATE BY FOOD INSPECTOR, KOPPA Case No: CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.1527/2016 Citation: 2022 LiveLaw (Kar) 234 The Karnataka High Court has set aside the conviction handed down under the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act by the trial court for a charge which it did not frame against the accused, and remanded the matter back to be considered afresh. 7. Karnataka High Court Dismisses Habeas Corpus Plea Moved By Transgender Person After Alleged Partner Denies Relationship Case Title: XXX v. STATE OF KARNATAKA Case No: WRIT PETITION HABEAS CORPUS No.57 OF 2022 Citation: 2022 LiveLaw (Kar) 235 The Karnataka High Court has dismissed a habeas corpus petition filed by a transgender person, seeking directions to the police to produce an 18-year old girl, alleged to be his partner. 8. Karnataka High Court Upholds Compulsory Retirement Of Civil Judge For Preparing Order Sheets Of Proceedings That Did Not Even Take Place Case Title: SHIVANAND LAXMAN ANCHI v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA Case No: WRIT PETITION No.16983 OF 2021 Citation: 2022 LiveLaw...

Karnataka High Court Weekly Round-Up: June 27 To July 3, 2022

Mustafa Plumber

Tags