Madras High Court Monthly Digest - January 2023 [Citations 1 to 37]

Citations: 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 1 To 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 37 NOMINAL INDEX Manikandan v. State, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 1 P Geetha v. V. Kirubaharan , 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 2 M/s.Tirupur Sree Annapoorna Versus Tamil Nadu Sales Tax Appellate, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 3 Easwaran Brothers India Private Limited Versus The Assistant Commissioner (ST) (FAC), 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 4 M Kannadasan v Union Of India, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 5 M/s. Radha Meditech v. M/s Cook India Medical Devices Pvt Ltd, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 6 People’s Watch v. The Home Secretary, Home Department (Prison) and another, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 7 PhonePe Private Limited v. DigiPe Fintech Private Limited, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 8 B Ramkumar Adityan v. Additional Chief Secretary and others, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 9 M/s. Raju Construction & Ors. versus The Government of India & Ors., 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 10 A Saravanan v. The State of Tamil Nadu and others, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 11 Po.Mu.Iraniyan @ Muthu Murugan v. The Union of India and others, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 12 D Elumalai v. The Commissioner of Milk Production and others, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 13 M.Munusamy @ Chinnapaiyan v. The Superintendent of Police, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 14 Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Coimbatore) Ltd and another v. B Rajeswari, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 15 Rathinam v State, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 16 M Mahalakshmi v. M Vijayakumar, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 17 Pugazendhi Thangaraj v. Inspector of Police, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 18 Timothy Donald Archer v. The Foreigner Regulation Registration Offer and others, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 19 Rajeshwari v State, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 20 G Shanmugasundar v. The Principal Secretary to Government and others, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 21 Sankareswari and another v. The District Collector and others, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 22 M/s AQJ Apparels Private Limited v. M/s Mmunna Garments and another, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 23 Tvl.Thiruvannamalaiyar Transport Versus The Deputy State Tax Officer, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 24 Mr. AD Padmasingh Issac and others v. Karaikudi Achi Mess and another, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 25 The Designated Officer v. Jayavilas Tobacco Traders LLP, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 26 M/s. Paul Raj Engineering v. Assistant Commissioner (Circle), 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 27 University Grants Commission and another v. Annamalai University and others, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 28 Vatsala Jagannathan & Anr. versus Tristar Accommodations & Ors., 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 29 G. Babu v. The District Collector and Ors., 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 30 Eswari v. Chief Secretary to Government of Tamil Nadu, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 31 RS Deva alias Kamadevan v. The Home Secretary and others, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 32 TR Ramesh v. State of Tamil Nadu and others, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 33 Mohammed Rafi v. State of Tamil Nadu and Others, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 34 Jeya Sudha v. Inspector of Police and another, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 35 P Amutha v Gunasekaran, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 36 Harina v. The Regional Passport Officer and Ors., 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 37 REPORTS [POCSO Act] Description Of Incident Assumes Significance As Child Might Not Know What Is Sexual Assault: Madras High Court Case Title: Manikandan v. State Citation: 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 1 While refusing to set aside the conviction of a man who was charged under the Prevention of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act, the Madras High Court held that in POCSO cases, the description of the incident by the child assumes a lot of significance to come to a conclusion as to whether there was penetrative sexual assault in a given case. The bench of Justice PN Prakash and Justice Anand Venkatesh noted that from the perspective of the child, a sexual assault may only be understood as a physical assault as the child is unaware of what a sexual assault is. Thus, the courts have to look into the description of the offence and come to a conclusion. Parents In Matrimonial Disputes Not Filing Applications For Minor Children's Maintenance, Duty Of Courts To Protect Their Interest: Madras High Court Case Title: P Geetha v. V. Kirubaharan Citation: 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 2 While allowing a petition filed by a woman for transfer of a divorce petition from Poonamalle to Tiruchirappalli, the Madras High Court said parents are duty bound to maintain their minor children and in absence of a formal application, the courts also are bound to consider grant of interim maintenance to protect the interests of minor children. Justice SM Subramaniam said though order of interim maintenance is conditional on the circumstances that the wife or husband, who makes the claim has no independent income sufficient for her or his support, it is no answer to a claim of maintenance that the wife is educated and could support herself. Entities Evading Tax Payment Are Liable To Be Punished Under Criminal Charges With Penalties: Madras High Court Case Title:...

Madras High Court Monthly Digest - January 2023 [Citations 1 to 37]

Upasana Sajeev

Tags