Madras High Court Monthly Digest - November 2022 [Citations 448 to 487]

Citations: 2022 LiveLaw (Mad) 448 To 2022 LiveLaw (Mad) 487 NOMINAL INDEX Commissioner of Income Tax v. M/s MAC Public Charitable Trust (batch), 2022 LiveLaw (Mad) 448 S Mukanchand Bothra (Died) and another v. The Chief Secretary and others, 2022 LiveLaw (Mad) 449 Senthil Balaji v State, 2022 LiveLaw (Mad) 450 Prasanna Gunasundari v The Deputy Inspector General of Police and others, 2022 LiveLaw (Mad) 451 K Kala v Secretary, Education Department and others, 2022 LiveLaw (Mad) 452 V Vijay and another v. The State and another, 2022 LiveLaw (Mad) 453 R Karthikeyan v. K Phanindra Reddy IAS, 2022 LiveLaw (Mad) 454 Life Insurance Corporation of India v. The National Commission for Scheduled Caste and another, 2022 LiveLaw (Mad) 455 Lilly Pushpam v The Additional Chief Secretary and others, 2022 LiveLaw (Mad) 456 N/s.Sayar Cars Versus The Appellate Deputy Commissioner (CT), 2022 LiveLaw (Mad) 457 Vinoth v Sub Divisional Magistrate and others, 2022 LiveLaw (Mad) 458 K Vinopratha v The Teachers Recruitment Board and another, 2022 LiveLaw (Mad) 459 Ramki Cements Private Limited Versus The State Tax Officer, 2022 LiveLaw (Mad) 460 Kirankumar Moolchand Jain versus TransUnion CIBIL Ltd., 2022 LiveLaw (Mad) 461 Sunitha v. Additional Chief Secretary to Government and others, 2022 LiveLaw (Mad) 462 S Rajarethinam (Deceased) and others v. State of Tamil Nadu and others, 2022 LiveLaw (Mad) 463 M/s. Polyhose India Private Limited versus The Additional Director General of Foreign Trade, 2022 LiveLaw (Mad) 464 M/s. Deetech Projects Pvt. Ltd. versus M/s. Batliboi Environmental Engineering Ltd., 2022 LiveLaw (Mad) 465 S Muthumalai Rani v The Secretary and others, 2022 LiveLaw (Mad) 466 Arul Daniel v Suganya and other connected matters, 2022 LiveLaw (Mad) 467 S Jagathrakshakan v The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, 2022 LiveLaw (Mad) 468 V Senthil Balaji v Nirmal Kumar and others, 2022 LiveLaw (Mad) 469 Viacom18 Media Private Limited v Bharath Sanchar Nigam Limited and others, 2022 LiveLaw (Mad) 470 M.R.Sivaramakrishnan v State and another, 2022 LiveLaw (Mad) 471 R Prema Latha and others v State and others, 2022 Livelaw (Mad) 472 Dr. K Sri Hari Prashanth and another v The Government of India and others, 2022 LiveLaw (Mad) 473 M Muthu v Union of India and others, 2022 LiveLaw (Mad) 474 Mr.K Varathan v Mr. Prakash Babu Nakundhi Reddy, 2022 LiveLaw (Mad) 475 P Muthusamy and ors v Mrs P Vennila and ors, 2022 LiveLaw (Mad) 476 M Kala and another v. The State of Tamil Nadu and others, 2022 LiveLaw (Mad) 477 Vinoth R v. Additional Chief Secretary to Government and others, 2022 LiveLaw (Mad) 478 Leelavathi and another v. Kamala and others, 2022 LiveLaw (Mad) 479 G Deepa and another v The General Manager and others, 2022 LiveLaw (Mad) 480 Rajamani v The Inspector General of Police (South Zone) and others, 2022 LiveLaw (Mad) 481 KR Raja v State, 2022 Livelaw (Mad) 482 Suo Motu v State of Tamil Nadu and others, 2022 LiveLaw (Mad) 483 V Annadurai v The Additional Chief Secretary to Government and others, 2022 LiveLaw (Mad) 484 SP Narayanan v District Collector, Thoothukudi, 2022 LiveLaw (Mad) 485 Arappor Iyakkam v The Director and others, 2022 LiveLaw (Mad) 486 A Veronica Mary v The State of Tamil Nadu and others, 2022 LiveLaw (Mad) 487 REPORTS 1. Education Not Commercial Activity, Collection Of Capitation Fee For Admission Illegal, No Tax Exemption: Madras High Court Case Title: Commissioner of Income Tax v. M/s MAC Public Charitable Trust (batch) Citation: 2022 LiveLaw (Mad) 448 The Madras High Court on Monday deprecated the practice of receiving capitation fee in exchange of admissions. The bench of Justice R Mahadevan and Justice Mohammed Shaffiq held that such practice of receiving capitation fee is against the Tamil Nadu Educational Institutions (Prohibition of Collection of Capitation Fee) Act, 1992. It is therefore beyond the pale of any doubt that education can never be a commercial activity or a trade or business and those in the field of education will have to constantly and consistently abide by this guiding principle. However, the undeniable reality staring at our face is the collection of capitation fee as a condition precedent for admission into educational institutions. 2. Failure To Act Upon Complaints Against Govt Officials Unconstitutional, Causes No Confidence In Public Authorities: Madras High Court Case Title: S Mukanchand Bothra (Died) and another v. The Chief Secretary and others Citation: 2022 LiveLaw (Mad) 449 The Madras High Court came down heavily on public authorities delaying action upon complaints by citizens against government officials. The court was hearing a plea by a man who had given a complaint to the Chief Secretary against an officer in 2016. When the complaint was not acted upon, ...

Madras High Court Monthly Digest - November 2022 [Citations 448 to 487]

Upasana Sajeev

Tags