Delhi High Court Annual Digest 2025: Part III [Citations 901 - 1350]

Citations 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 901 to 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1350Civil Courts Not Prohibited From Granting Anti-Arbitration Injunction In Foreign-Seated Arbitration If Proceedings Are Vexatious: Delhi HCCase Title: ENGINEERING PROJECTS (INDIA) LIMITED Versus MSA GLOBAL LLC (OMAN)Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 901The Delhi High Court bench of Justice Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav has held that Civil Courts are not prohibited from granting anti arbitration injunction in a foreign seated arbitration if the proceedings are conducted in a vexatious and oppressive manner.Mere Pendency Of Formal Signature By One Party Doesn't Preclude Parties From Being Referred To Arbitration: Delhi HC Allows Vedanta's PleaCase Title: VEDANTA LIMITED versus GUJARAT STATE PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTDCitation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 902The Delhi High Court bench of Justice Subramonium Prasad has held that the mere pendency of a formal signature by one party, when the other party has signed the agreement after reading and understanding its terms, including the arbitration clause, does not prevent the parties from being referred to arbitration.Wife's Failure To Provide Exact Date Of Alleged Torture Doesn't Mean Her Domestic Violence Case Is Without Any Basis: Delhi High CourtTitle: X v. State & AnrCitation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 903The Delhi High Court has observed that merely because the wife fails to provide the exact date and time of the alleged tortures by the husband and his family members does not mean that her case filed under the Domestic Violence Act is without any basis.'Apathy', Poor Coordination Among Civic Agencies Worsening Delhi Flooding: High Court Urges Govt To Consider Centralised Flood ManagementTitle: MAHARANI BAGH CO-OPERATIVE HOUSE BUILDING AND WELFARE SOCIETY LTD., & ANR v. UNION OF INDIA& ORSCitation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 904Observing that there is an "enormous confusion" between the civic agencies, the Delhi High Court has directed the concerned senior functionaries of the Delhi Government to take a decision on some centralisation of administration and management of the flooding in the national capital.Delhi High Court Denies Relief To DMRC Engineer Accused Of Stealing Ticket Machine, Selling Illegally Recharged Smart CardsTitle: VIJENDER KUMAR v. DELHI METRO RAIL CORPORATION & ORSCitation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 905The Delhi High Court has refused to stay disciplinary proceedings against a Junior Engineer working with Delhi Metro Rail Corporation (DMRC) accused of stealing the ticket machine and selling illegally recharged smart cards, causing loss of Rs. 28 lakh to the organisation.Delhi High Court Asks PWD To Advance ₹25 Lakh To Army For Bailey Bridge To Prevent Rajputana Rifles Soldiers' Passage Through Filthy DrainTitle: COURT ON ITS OWN MOTION v. DELHI CONTCitation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 906The Delhi High Court has directed the Public Works Department (PWD) to pay an advance sum of Rs. 25 lakh to the Army for initiating construction of a Bailey Bridge for soldiers of the Rajputana Rifles who have to pass through a filthy drain every morning while marching out of their barracks for heading towards the parade ground.Delhi High Court Dismisses Another Plea Against Centre's Decision To Revoke Celebi's Security ClearanceTitle: Celebi Ground Handling India Private Limited v. Union of IndiaCitation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 907The Delhi High Court dismissed a plea filed by another plea filed by Turkey based company namely Celebi Ground Handling India Private Limited, challenging the decision of the Central Government's Bureau of Civil Aviation Security (BCAS) revoking its security clearance in the "interest of national security".Delhi High Court Refuses To Quash FIR Over Death Of 5-Yr-Old In Road Accident, Says Accepting Compromise Would Sanctify 'Blood Money'Title: VIPIN GUPTA v. THE STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ORSCitation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 908The Delhi High Court has refused to quash an FIR registered against a man who was driving his car in a rash and negligent manner which hit an e-rickshaw resulting in the death of a 5 year old child.Delhi High Court Orders Zee Media To Broadcast Businessman Vikas Garg's Response To Allegedly Defamatory Video Aired Against HimCase title: Vikas Garg v. Zee Media Corporation Ltd & Ors.Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 909The Delhi High Court has ordered Zee Media Corporation, which owns and runs Zee News and Zee Business channels, to air the response of businessman Vikas Garg, to an alleged defamatory video run by the channels against him.Delhi High Court Bats For Safe Digital Space For Children, Says Cyberbullying Can Be As Scarring As Physical ViolenceTitle: RAJESH GAMBHIR v. STATE GNCT OF DELHI AND ANRCitation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 910The Delhi High Court has called for providing safe digital space for children, while emphasizing that such protection cannot be restricted to physical spaces alone.Disclosing Details Of Matrimonial Litigation To Defend Collateral Civil & Criminal Litigation Not Barred U/S 22 HMA: Delhi...

Delhi High Court Annual Digest 2025: Part III [Citations 901 - 1350]

Nupur Thapliyal

Tags