Punjab & Haryana High Court Monthly Digest: July 2025

Nominal Index [Citations 261 - 308]AXXXXX v. XXXXXX 2025 LiveLaw (PH) 261Kanwar Pahul Singh v. State of Punjab and others 2025 LiveLaw (PH) 262XXXX v. XXXXX 2025 LiveLaw (PH) 263Sunil v. State of Haryana and others 2025 LiveLaw (PH) 264Suhail v. State of Haryana 2025 LiveLaw (PH) 265Navpreet Singh and others v. State of Punjab 2025 LiveLaw (PH) 266Harpreet Singh @ Hira vs. State of Punjab 2025 LiveLaw (PH) 267DALJIT SINGH v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS 2025 LiveLaw (PH) 268 Rajesh Kumar Gaba v. Central Bureau of Investigation 2025 LiveLaw (PH) 269 KULWINDER KAUR v. STATE OF PUNJAB 2025 LiveLaw (PH) 270MUSHTAQ AHMED v. STATE OF HARYANA 2025 LiveLaw (PH) 271 Resident Welfare Association, Taksila Heights Sector 37-C, Gurugram v. State of Haryana and others 2025 LiveLaw (PH) 272 Raj Kumar v. Rajender 2025 LiveLaw (PH) 273Constable Simranjeet Singh and others v. State of Punjab 2025 LiveLaw (PH) 274Atharv Sharma, Minor through his Natural Guardian & Father Sh. Kuldeep Sharma v. State of Punjab and others 2025 LiveLaw (PH) 275Jaspal Singh @ Jassa v. State of Punjab and others 2025 LiveLaw (PH) 276Union of India and others v. Ex. Sep. B Rama Krishna and another 2025 LiveLaw (PH) 277Ram Vinesh Saw v. State of Punjab and others 2025 LiveLaw (PH) 278Kuldeep Singh v. State of Punjab 2025 LiveLaw (PH) 279Chanchal Mehbub Singh v. State of Punjab and others 2025 LiveLaw (PH) 280Makul @ Mohamad Makul v. State of Haryana 2025 LiveLaw (PH) 281RAVNEET KAUR v. BAR COUNCIL OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AND ANR 2025 LiveLaw (PH) 282BIREM SINGH v. CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION AND ANOTHER 2025 LiveLaw (PH) 283PINKY ALIAS PINCKY & ANOTHER v. THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR FORFEITED PROPERTY & OTHER 2025 LiveLaw (PH) 284Colonel Pushpendra Bath v UT Chandigarh & Ors. 2025 LiveLaw (PH) 285BHISHAM KINGER V/S STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS 2025 LiveLaw (PH) 286Suresh Chand v. State of Punjab 2025 LiveLaw (PH) 287Harjinder Singh alias Raj alias Rajinder Singh v. State of Punjab 2025 LiveLaw (PH) 288Jitender Kumar v. State of Haryana and others 2025 LiveLaw (PH) 289Paramjit Singh v. State of Punjab & Ors 2025 LiveLaw (PH) 290RXXX v. State of Haryana 2025 LiveLaw (PH) 291Uggar Singh v. State of Punjab and others 2025 LiveLaw (PH) 292RAKHI v. STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER 2025 LiveLaw (PH) 293Baba Gurmeet Singh @ Maharaj Gurmeet Singh @ Gurmeet Ram Rahim Singh v. Central Bureau of Investigation 2025 LiveLaw (PH) 294Jaswinder Singh alias Kala v. State of Punjab 2025 LiveLaw (PH) 295BARKHA BANSAL VS. STATE OF U.T., CHANDIGARH & OTHERS 2025 LiveLaw (PH) 296XXXX v. XXXX 2025 LiveLaw (PH) 297Surender v. State of Haryana and others 2025 LiveLaw (PH) 298KANU SHARMA V/S HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AND OTHERS 2025 LiveLaw (PH) 299XXXX v. XXX 2025 LiveLaw (PH) 300Gurtej Singh Dhillon v. State of Punjab and others 2025 LiveLaw (PH) 301SXXXX v. State of Punjab 2025 LiveLaw (PH) 302Arshad v. State of Haryana and Ors. 2025 LiveLaw (PH) 303Jaswant and others v. State of Haryana and others 2025 LiveLaw (PH) 304Niyaz etc. v. State of Haryana 2025 LiveLaw (PH) 305XXX v. XXX 2025 LiveLaw (PH) 306XXXXX v. XXXXX [CRR-1165-2025] 2025 LiveLaw (PH) 307Suresh Kumar Sharma (deceased) through LRs v. State of Haryana and Ors. 2025 LiveLaw (PH) 308ReportsWife Can't Be Denied Maintenance Merely Because She Is A Graduate: Punjab & Haryana High CourtTitle: AXXXXX v. XXXXXXCitation: 2025 LiveLaw (PH) 261The Punjab and Haryana High Court has held that a wife cannot be denied maintenance merely because she is a graduate and capable of earning, especially when she is not gainfully employed.Justice Jasgurpreet Singh Puri said, "mere fact that the respondent/wife is a graduate would not itself mean that she can be denied of the Right of Maintenance which is conferred upon her by way of a statutory provision unless the right to seek maintenance can be curtailed under the grounds which have been mentioned under Section 125 Cr.P.C. or when her income is so high as compared to the husband and it can be found that she is able to maintain herself, then in that situation she may not be entitled for grant of maintenance."P&H High Court Closes PIL Against Use Of 'Chinese Dor' To Fly Kites, Notes Steps Taken By State To Curb Use & Reward InformersTitle: Kanwar Pahul Singh v. State of Punjab and othersCitation: 2025 LiveLaw (PH) 262Observing that the Punjab Government authorities had already initiated steps, including penalties and rewards for informers reporting incidents of death by use of banned Chinese Dor, the Punjab & Haryana High Court has disposed of the second PIL filed to curb the menace.A division bench of Chief Justice Sheel Nagu and Justice Sumeet Goel noted, "it is obvious that steps have already been taken by the concerned authorities by prescribing penalty as well as announcing a reward upto Rs. 25,000/- for informer, informing about an incident of injury or death due to use of Chinese Dor."Husband Has 'Duty To Earn More' To Pay Maintenance To Wife, Children If He Is Unable...

Punjab & Haryana High Court Monthly Digest: July 2025

Aiman J. Chishti

Tags