Telangana High Court Annual Digest 2025

Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Tel) 1 To 2025 LiveLaw (Tel) 144Telangana High Court Directs Cyberabad Police To Issue Advisory To Gated Communities, Flat Associations For Preventing Illegal ActivitiesCh Hari Govinda Khorana Reddy vs. State of Telangana and Others 2025 LiveLaw (Tel) 1 Justice B Vijaysen Reddy in his December 31 order passed a slew of directions while hearing a writ petition filed by a lawyer–who is a resident of Indu fortune Villa (Gated community) with a prayer to direct the concerned police officials to act on his complaint and stop alleged illegal activities taking place in the Clubhouse of the Gated Community. Telangana High Court Refuses To Quash FIR Against BRS MLA KT Rama Rao In Formula E Race "Scam" Case KT Rama Rao v/s State of Telangana (ACB) 2025 LiveLaw (Tel) 2 The Telangana High Court on Tuesday (January 7) refused to quash the FIR lodged against BRS MLA KT Rama Rao over alleged irregularities in the conduct of Formula-E race in Hyderabad when BRS was in power. After hearing the matter for some time Justice K Lakshman refused to quash the FIR against Rao Former Minister KT Rama Rao Was Prima Facie 'Entrusted' With Formula E Race Funds Which Were Allegedly Misused: Telangana High Court KT Rama Rao v/s State of Telangana (ACB) and Anr. 2025 LiveLaw (Tel) 3 Dismissing BRS MLA KT Rama Rao's plea for quashing an FIR over the alleged Formula-E race "scam", the Telangana High Court on Tuesday said that Rao as then Urban Development Minister was controlling the Hyderabad Metropolitan Development Authority and thus the body's funds which were allegedly misused, were "prima facie" entrusted with him. Formula E Race Case: Telangana High Court Permits KT Rama Rao's Lawyer To Watch ACB Interrogation Through Glass Window KT Rama Rao v State of Telangana and Others 2025 LiveLaw (Tel) 4 Telangana High Court on Wednesday (January 8) permitted BRS MLA KT Rama Rao's lawyer to be present in the library room in the Anti Corruption Bureau's office–stated to be opposite to the examination room where Rao will to be interrogated in the FormulaE Race case on Thursday, so that his lawyer can observe the proceedings. Justice K Lakshman while dictating the order clarified that having a lawyer present during interrogation is not a matter of right. However in view of the status of the petitioner, the court permitted his lawyer to sit in the library which has a glass window and is opposite to the examination room. S.168A GST Act | 'Recommendation' Of GST Council To Extend Limitation Period Can Be Substituted By Subsequent 'Ratification': Telangana HC M/s.Brunda Infra Pvt. Limited and Others. vs. The Additional Commissioner of Central Tax 2025 LiveLaw (Tel) 5 The Telangana High Court has upheld the validity of two 2023 notifications, issued by the GST Department post COVID-19 pandemic, for extending the limitation period prescribed for issuing notices under Section 73 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. A division bench of Justice Sujoy Paul and Dr. Justice G. Radha Rani also upheld a notification issued in 2022 for similar purpose. In doing so, it observed, “In the manner statute i.e., Section 168A is worded, there is no cavil of doubt that the Law makers intended to give it a broader umbrella to bring within its shadow, such actions which could not be completed or complied with, due to force majeure…The COVID-19 Pandemic created extraordinary difficulties which could not have been anticipated, measured and solved with mathematical precision. Thus, hair-splitting in many aspects must be eschewed…While dealing with such an extraordinary crisis, Government's action must be viewed in a broad perspective.” Inculcating Religious Feelings Amongst Members Of A Particular Community Not A Public Function Or Public Duty: Telangana HC Reiterates Gowripaga Albert Lael and two others vs. Joseph D'Souza & 11 ors 2025 LiveLaw (Tel) 6 Dismissing a plea by former employees of certain public trusts/charities– some of whom are stated to be engaged in imparting education and religious teachings– alleging misappropriation of funds, the Telangana High Court reiterated that inculcating religious feelings among members of a particular community cannot be equated to public function or discharge of a public duty. The court further reiterated that even imparting education, per se, will not pull the respondent trusts/charities within the ambit of Article 226 of the Constitution unless it can be shown that they discharge a public duty which has a public law element. Medical Assessment & Rating Board Has Power Under National Medical Commission Act To Shift Students To Other Colleges: Telangana HC TRR Institute of Medical Sciences and others vs. Union of India and batch 2025 LiveLaw (Tel) 7 Upholding an order of Medical Assessment and Rating Board for shifting students from two medical colleges to other institutes as...

Telangana High Court Annual Digest 2025

Fareedunnisa Huma

Tags