Bombay High Court Monthly Digest: August 2022 [Citations 275 – 312]

Nominal IndexCitations 2022 LiveLaw (Bom) 275 to 2022 LiveLaw (Bom) 312Vikas Balwant Alase & Ors. v. Union of India through Secretary & Ors. with connected matters 2022 LiveLaw (Bom) 275Smita Pansare v. State of Maharashtra 2022 LiveLaw (Bom) 276Mr. Ashwin Ashokrao Karokar v. Mr. Laxmikant Govind Joshi 2022 LiveLaw (Bom) 277Xyz v. The State of Maharashtra & Ors (WP 9012 of 2022) 2022 LiveLaw (Bom) 278Rajendra R. Singh v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax and Ors. 2022 LiveLaw (Bom) 279Sukoon Construction Pvt. Ltd v. The Collector of Stamp & Anr. 2022 LiveLaw (Bom) 280Smarte Solutions Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India and Ors. 2022 LiveLaw (Bom) 281Vasant v. State of Maharashtra and Ors. 2022 LiveLaw (Bom) 282Kirit Somaiya v. State of Maharashtra 2022 LiveLaw (Bom) 283Novafor Samuel Inoamaobi v. The State of Maharashtra 2022 LiveLaw (Bom) 284 B. Chopda Construction Private Limited v. Union of India and Ors. 2022 LiveLaw (Bom) 285Obedullah Abdul Rashid Radiowala v. State of Maharashtra 2022 LiveLaw (Bom) 286Novafor Samuel Inoamaobi v. The State of Maharashtra 2022 LiveLaw (Bom) 287Mohammad Rafique Mohammad Saleem Siddiqui v. The State of Maharashtra 2022 LiveLaw (Bom) 288Vanashakti & Anr v. Revenue & Forest Dept, State of Maharashtra & Ors 2022 LiveLaw (Bom) 289Chirag R. Mehta v. The State Of Karnataka 2022 LiveLaw (Bom) 290Prathamesh v. Union of India and Anr. 2022 LiveLaw (Bom) 291Raju Jokhanprasad Gupta v. State of Maharashtra 2022 LiveLaw (Bom) 292S. J. Enterprises & Anr. v. Union of India 2022 LiveLaw (Bom) 293Vishwajit Sud & Co. v. L & T Stec JV, Mumbai 2022 LiveLaw (Bom) 294Siddhi Real Estate Developers v. State of Maharashtra & Anr. 2022 LiveLaw (Bom) 295Vipul Chitalia v. CBI and Anr. 2022 LiveLaw (Bom) 296Subodh M Joshi v. Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai & Ors. 2022 LiveLaw (Bom) 297Ashok Palav Coop. Housing Society Ltd. v. Pankaj Bhagubhai Desai & Anr. 2022 LiveLaw (Bom) 298Shyamwar Pinturam Rai v. CBI & Anr. 2022 LiveLaw (Bom) 299Aditya Birla Sun Life Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Insurance Ombudsman & Anr. 2022 LiveLaw (Bom) 300Madhukar Makaji Mudgul v. The State of Maharashtra 2022 LiveLaw (Bom) 301Rahul Uttam Phadtare v. Sarika Rahul Phadtare; 2022 LiveLaw (Bom) 302National Highways Authority of India v. The Additional Commissioner, Nagpur and Ors.; 2022 LiveLaw (Bom) 303MEP Infrastructure Developers Ltd. & Ors. v. MSRDC Sea Link Ltd. & Ors.; 2022 LiveLaw (Bom) 304Farzin Ardeshir Adel & Ors. v. MCGM & Ors. and Jatin Bhankharia v. MCGM & Ors.; 2022 LiveLaw (Bom) 305Phoenix Arc Pvt. Ltd. v. State of Maharashtra; 2022 LiveLaw (Bom) 306Ramchandra Shrimant Bhandare v. The State of Maharashtra; 2022 LiveLaw (Bom) 307BXIN Office Parks India Pvt. Ltd. v. Kailasa Urja Pvt. Ltd.; 2022 LiveLaw (Bom) 308Anand I Power Ltd. v. Chief Controlling Revenue Authority & Ors.; 2022 LiveLaw (Bom) 309Nizar Noorali Rangara and Anr. v. State of Maharashtra and Ors. 2022 LiveLaw (Bom) 310USP Studios Pvt. Ltd. v. Ganpati Enterprises & Ors. 2022 LiveLaw (Bom) 311Relcon Infroprojects Ltd. & Anr. v. Ridhi Sidhi Sadan, Unit of Shree Ridhi Co. Op. Housing Society Ltd. & Ors. 2022 LiveLaw (Bom) 312ReportsBombay High Court Disallows Maratha Community Candidates To Avail Retrospective Benefits Under EWS Category In MSEDCL Recruitment DriveCase Title- Vikas Balwant Alase & Ors. v. Union of India through Secretary & Ors. with connected mattersCitation – 2022 LiveLaw (Bom) 275The Bombay High Court declared as "unjustified" and "Illegal" Maharashtra Government's decision to allow members of the Maratha community to avail benefits under the Economically Weaker Section (EWS) category midway through an electricity distribution recruitment drive. The court said that Maratha community candidates (SEBC candidates) were aware that their selection process would be subject to Supreme Court's order in the Maratha Reservation matter.So once SC's interim order barred them from being considered under the reserved category of MSEBC Act in 2020, the State couldn't have issued a GR permitting eligible candidates to be considered under the EWS reservation. Govind Pansare Murder: Bombay High Court Directs Transfer Of Probe To Anti-Terrorism SquadCase Title - Smita Pansare v. State of MaharashtraCitation - 2022 LiveLaw (Bom) 276The Bombay High Court directed the transfer of investigation into the 2015 murder of communist leader Govind Pansare from the Special investigations Team to the ATS's Anti-Terrorism Squad, seven years after the leader was shot at on his morning walk. The bench observed that it has been monitoring the SIT's investigation in the case since 2016, but no major headway is made and sharpshooters are still absconding."Despite the efforts of the Officers of SIT, there is no breakthrough. The wait for the family of Comrade Pansare has been long, for almost seven years. There is a legitimate expectation not only for the family of Comrade Pansare, but also the public at large, to see that the perpetrators of the ghastly crime, are brought to...

Bombay High Court Monthly Digest: August 2022 [Citations 275 – 312]

Amisha Shrivastava

This is a premium content
Available exclusively to
Our subscribers

INR 1099+GST

Tags

Amisha Shrivastava

Bombay High Court Monthly Digest: August 2022 [Citations 275 – 312]

Amisha Shrivastava

This is a premium content Available exclusively to Our subscribers

INR 1099+GST

Tags

Amisha Shrivastava

This is a premium content
Available exclusively to
Our subscribers