AICTE Not Entitled To Regulate Degrees/Diploma In Architecture Education: SC

Norms and Regulations set by Council of Architecture and other specified authorities under the Architects Act would have to be followed by an institution imparting education for degrees and diplomas in architecture.

How Supreme Court Decreed The Title Suit Filed By Ram Lalla?

What the Supreme Court has essentially done in the Ayodhya case is that it has decreed the Suit filed by "Bhagwan Sri Ram Lala Virajman" in terms of prayer clauses (A) and (B) of the suit, subject to some directions. The conditions while decreeing the suit by Ram Lalla includes framing of a scheme and a trust for the construction of the temple at Rama Janmabhumi, the erstwhile disputed site. ...

Why SC Held That Ram Janam Bhumi Is Not A Juristic Person?

100 pages in the judgment in Ayodhya case deals with the concept of Juristic Personality. The issue became relevant because the plaintiffs in one of the suits were the deity "Bhagwan Sri Ram Virajman" and "Asthan Sri Ram Janam Bhumi, Ayodhya". The court noted that legal personality of the first plaintiff (Bhagwan Sri Ram Virajman) as represented by the physical idols of Lord Ram at the...

Hindus Always Believed That The Present Site Of Ram Janma Bhumi Was The Birthplace Of Lord Ram.: SC's Addenda [Read Judgment]

"Faith and belief of the Hindus as depicted by the evidence on record clearly establish that the Hindus belief that at the birth place of Lord Ram, the Mosque was constructed and three-dome structure is the birth place of Lord Ram."

Who Is The Author Of Ayodhya Judgment?

The 1045-pages judgment of the Supreme Court in the Ayodhya-Babri Masjid land dispute case does not disclose the name of the judge who authored it.This is highly unusual and in departure from convention. The established practice is to specify the name of the judge who has authored the judgment on behalf of a bench.The matter was heard by a five judges bench comprising CJI Ranjan Gogoi, Justice...

Babri Mosque Demolition An Egregious Violation Of The Rule Of Law, Wrong Committed Must Be Remedied: SC [Read Judgment]

"Justice would not prevail if the Court were to overlook the entitlement of the Muslims who have been deprived of the structure of the mosque through means which should not have been employed in a secular nation committed to the rule of law."

Breaking: Ayodhya Verdict- Key Observations In SC Judgment [Read Judgment]

The Five judge bench of the Supreme Court has pronounced the judgment in Ayodhya case today.The court has held that the entire disputed land of 2.77 acres in Ayodhya must be handed over for the construction of Ram Mandir. At the same time, the Court held that an alternate plot of 5 acres must be allotted to the Sunni Waqf Board for construction of mosque. The Court observed that the...

[Breaking] [Ayodhya] : SC Allows Temple Construction In Disputed Land; Alternate Plot Of 5 Acres For Mosque [Read Judgment]

In an unanimous verdict, the Supreme Court on Saturday held that the entire disputed land of 2.77 acres in Ayodhya must be handed over for the construction of Ram Mandir.At the same time, the Court held that an alternate plot of 5 acres must be allotted to the Sunni Waqf Board for construction of mosque. This direction was passed invoking powers under Article 142 of the Constitution. The...

Ayodhya Hearing : Key Arguments Made By Parties In SC

The key arguments made by the parties in the Ayodhya-Babri Masjid title dispute case are summarized below :Arguments by Ramlalla, Nirmohi Akhara etc.The main Hindu parties in the case were Ramlalla Virajman (the deity), Nirmohi Akhara and the legal representatives of Gopal Singh Visharad, a believer who filed a suit in 1950 seeking right of worship in the disputed land.The main points urged...

Breaking- Supreme Court To Pronounce Judgment In Ayodhya Case Tomorrow [Read Notice]

The Supreme Court will pronounce the much awaited judgment in Ayodhya Babri Masjid land dispute case tomorrow.The matter has been listed at 10.30 a.m. for pronouncement of judgment in Chief Justice's Court tomorrow.The bench comprising CJI Ranjan Gogoi, Justices Bobde, Chandrachud, Ashok Bhushan and Abdul Nazeer will hold a special sitting on Saturday to pronounce the judgment. The five...

SC Sets Aside NCLAT Order Which Held That Dissenting Financial Creditor Should Not Be Discriminated [Read Judgment]

The Supreme Court on Friday set aside an order passed by the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal which held that a dissenting financial creditor cannot be discriminated.A bench comprising Justices Arun Mishra and Ravindra Bhat allowed the appeal filed by Rahul Jain, the resolution applicant in the insolvency of Rave Scans Private Ltd.The appellant was aggrieved with the NCLAT's direction...

HCs Have Power To Dispense With Disciplinary Proceedings For Dismissing Judicial Officers By Recording Reasons: SC [Read Judgment]

The Supreme Court has observed that the High Courts have power to dispense with the disciplinary proceedings by invoking clause (b) of the second proviso to Article 311(2) of the Constitution of India, by recording reasons, for In this case, a Full Court resolution was passed for dismissal of the judicial officers from judicial service in the State Government of Bihar, dispensing with...