Kerala High Court Weekly Round Up : May 30 To June 4, 2022

Nominal Index [Citations: 2022 LiveLaw (Ker) 248 - 258]SNDP Yogam & Anr v. G. Krishnamoorthy & Ors, 2022 LiveLaw (Ker) 248Dr. Vikas R.S v. State of Kerala & Ors, 2022 LiveLaw (Ker) 249Vijay Babu v. State of Kerala & Anr, 2022 LiveLaw (Ker) 250Adhila v Commissioner of Police & Ors, 2022 LiveLaw (Ker) 251Vijith Vijayan v. Union of India, 2022 LiveLaw (Ker) 252Aboobacker K.A & Ors v. Joint Regional Transport Officer, 2022 LiveLaw (Ker) 253Mannam Sugar Mills Cooperative Ltd v. Deputy Superintendent of Police, 2022 LiveLaw (Ker) 254R. Baji & Ors. v. KSRTC & Ors, 2022 LiveLaw (Ker) 255 State of Kerala & Anr. v. P. Gopalakrishnan alias Dileep, 2022 LiveLaw (Ker) 256 T.A Ansad v. Sanjay Kumar Thunjhunwala & Ors, 2022 LiveLaw (Ker) 257Abdul Gafoor @ Kunhumon v. Asst. Director, Directorate of Enforcement & Ors, 2022 LiveLaw (Ker) 258Judgments This Week1. Scheme For Administration Of SNDP Yogam Should Be Framed As Per Companies Act: Kerala High Court Upholds District Court's OrderCase Title: SNDP Yogam & Anr v. G. Krishnamoorthy & Ors Citation: 2022 LiveLaw (Ker) 248 The Kerala High Court has upheld the order of the Ernakulam District Court that a scheme for the administration of the Sree Narayana Dharma Paripalana (SNDP) Yogam shall be framed in accordance with the provisions of the Companies Act. A Division Bench of Justice P.B Suresh Kumar and Justice C.S Sudha dismissed the appeal filed by SNDP Yogam, its general secretary Vellappally Natesan and a few others finding no infirmity in the decision of the district court.2. Kerala High Court Upholds NEET- PG Prospectus, Says State Can Decide Incentives To Be Offered To In-Service CandidatesCase Title: Dr. Vikas R.S v. State of Kerala & Ors.Citation: 2022 LiveLaw (Ker) 249The Kerala High Court has dismissed a batch of appeals that assailed the NEET- PG medical prospectus on the ground of incongruity with the Medical Council of India (MCI) Regulations regarding the incentives given to in-service candidates and a connected appeal seeking weightage to service candidates in the open merit quota. Chief Justice S. Manikumar and Justice Shaji P Chaly observed that this was a policy decision of the Government to regulate and meet up with the requirements in the respective departments so as to cater for the needs of the public at large and that the appellants had failed to make out any case of arbitrariness, unfairness, malafides or any other legal infirmities susceptible to have been interfered with by the court.3. Kerala High Court Grants Interim Pre-Arrest Bail To Actor-Producer Vijay Babu In Rape CaseCase Title: Vijay Babu v. State of Kerala & Anr. Citation: 2022 LiveLaw (Ker) 250The Kerala High Court granted interim pre-arrest bail until the next posting of the case to Malayalam actor-producer Vijay Babu's plea for anticipatory bail in the case where an actress accused him of sexually exploiting her. Justice Bechu Kurian Thomas directed so after noting that the actor was willing to submit himself before the jurisdiction of the Court and that he was apprehending immediate arrest from the airport.Also Read: Anticipatory Bail Application Maintainable Even If Accused Is Outside The Country : Kerala High CourtAlso Read: Vijay Babu Back In India, Interrogation Going On: State Informs Kerala High Court4. Kerala High Court Reunites Lesbian Couple Forcibly Separated By ParentsCase Title: Adhila v Commissioner of Police & Ors.Citation: 2022 LiveLaw (Ker) 251The Kerala High Court came to the rescue of a lesbian couple by reuniting them after they were forcibly separated by their parents and family members. A Division Bench of Justice K Vinod Chandran and Justice C Jayachandran allowed the habeas corpus plea moved by Adhila after her partner, Fathima Noora was taken away by her parents.5. UAPA Case| Kerala High Court Refuses Bail To 4th Accused Over Alleged Maoist LinksCase Title: Vijith Vijayan v. Union of IndiaCitation: 2022 LiveLaw (Ker) 252The Kerala High Court has rejected the bail plea of Vijith Vijayan, the fourth accused in the UAPA case over alleged Maoist links finding that there was prima facie evidence to suggest his involvement in the terror case. A Division Bench of Justice K. Vinod Chandran and Justice C. Jayachandran observed that the general purport of the secret documents in his handwriting prima facie establishes his active participation of the accused in the organizational development and propagation of ideology, both running contrary to the established administrative machinery controlled by an elected Government.6. Can't Adopt Rule Of Convenience: Kerala High Court Issues Traffic Directions For Private Transport Buses And AutorickshawsCase Title: Aboobacker K.A & Ors v. Joint Regional Transport OfficerCitation: 2022 LiveLaw (Ker) 253The Kerala High Court directed the Police Commissioner and the Regional Transport Authority in Kochi to immediately issue orders prohibiting private transport buses from using horns in city limits and to ensure that they ply only...

Kerala High Court Weekly Round Up : May 30 To June 4, 2022

Hannah M Varghese

Tags