Supreme Court Reserves Judgment On Pleas Challenging Demonetisation; Asks Centre & RBI To Produce Relevant Records

The Supreme Court on Wednesday reserved judgment on a batch of petitions challenging the decision taken by the Union Government six years ago to demonetise the currency notes of Rs. 500 and Rs.1000 denominations.A Constitution Bench comprising Justices S Abdul Nazeer, BR Gavai, AS Bopanna, V Ramasubramanian and BV Nagarathna heard arguments in a batch of 58 petitions. The bench allowed parties to give written submission by December 10.The Court also asked the Union Government and the Reserve Bank of India to produce the relevant records. Attorney General for India R Venkataramani said that the documents will be produce in a sealed cover.During the hearing, the bench had observed that it will not sit with folded hands just because it was an economic policy decision and stated that it can examine the manner in which the decision was taken. The bench had initially expressed the view that the issue was "academic", considering the fact that six years have gone by since the decision and wondered if it can undo the actions. However, on October 12, the bench agreed to hear the matter on merits, after the persuasive arguments made by Senior Advocate P Chidambaram. The bench required the Union Government and the Reserve Bank of India to produce before it the relevant documents and files relating to the decision.From the petitioners' side, Senior Advocate P Chidambaram opened the arguments. Although the effects of the decision cannot be undone, the Court should lay down the law for the future, so that "similar misadventures" are not repeated by the future governments. Senior Advocate Shyam Divan, Advocate Prashant Bhushan etc also made arguments for some petitioners. Among the batch were certain petitions filed by persons seeking extension of the deadline for exchanging the notes.Attorney General for India R Venkataramani appeared for the Union Government to defend the decision. AG submitted that the decision was taken to curb the evils of fake currency, black money and terror funding. He argued that the scope of judicial review in economic policy decisions is extremely narrow. Even if it is assumed the demonetisation has not succeeded in producing the intended results, that cannot be a reason to invalidate the decision judicially, as it has been taken in good faith after following due process.Senior Advocate Jaideep Gupta, appearing for the Reserve Bank of India, submitted that the Union Government took the decision based on the recommendation given by the central bank.Click Here To Read/Download OrderReports of previous hearings :Demonetisation| 'Fake Currency, Black Money, Terror Funding Like Jarasandha From Mahabharata, Had to Cut Them Into Pieces' : AG Tells Supreme CourtWe Gave The Recommendation For Demonetisation, All Procedures Followed : RBI Tells Supreme CourtRBI Should Consider Genuine Applications To Exchange Demonetised Notes Of Persons Who Missed Deadline, Says Supreme Court During HearingPrime Minister's Assurances On Time To Exchange Demonetised Banknotes Can't Be Ignored By RBI & Govt : Shyam Divan Tells Supreme CourtDemonetisation Challenge: "What Can Be Done Now?", Asks Supreme Court; Lay Down Law To Prevent "Similar Misadventures" In Future, Says P ChidambaramCentre Withholding Crucial Documents On Demonetisation; RBI Or Cabinet Had No Full Information : P Chidambaram Tells Supreme CourtDecision To Withdraw 86% Currency Taken Within 24 Hours, Demonetisation Contrary To RBI Act : P Chidambaram To Supreme CourtDemonetisation Challenge : Supreme Court Wants To See RBI Board Meeting Documents, Centre's Recommendation; Seeks Comprehensive AffidavitChallenge To Demonetisation Not Academic : Supreme Court Seeks Affidavits Of Union & RBI

Supreme Court Reserves Judgment On Pleas Challenging Demonetisation; Asks Centre & RBI To Produce Relevant Records

LIVELAW NEWS NETWORK

Tags