Delhi High Court Annual Digest 2025: Part I [Citations 1 - 450]

Citations 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1 to 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 450Delhi High Court Directs Medical Treatment For HIV Positive Trans Woman Without Insisting On ID ProofTitle: ABC v. UNION OF INDIA AND ORSCitation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1The Delhi High Court has directed Lok Nayak Hospital to provide medical treatment for a trans woman who tested HIV positive, without demanding from her identification documents.Justice Sanjeev Narula issued notice on the plea moved by the trans woman claiming that she tested positive for HIV after being sexually abused by various people.Delhi High Court Orders Immediate Construction, Repair Of District Courts Washrooms; Calls For Uniform Standard Of HygieneTitle: SMITA KUMARI RAJGARHIA v. GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHICitation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 2The Delhi High Court has directed immediate construction and repair work of washrooms in the district courts.Justice Sanjeev Narula said that the direction shall apply to male, female and handicapped washrooms in the District Courts to ensure a uniform standard of hygiene and functionality.Delhi High Court Passes John Doe Order To Protect Trademark, Artistic Works Of Fashion Designer Rahul MishraTitle: RAHUL MISHRA & ANR. v. JOHN DOE & ANRCitation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 3The Delhi High Court has passed a john doe order in order to protect the copyright in the original artistic work as well as trademark registered in favour of Indian fashion designer Rahul Mishra.Justice Amit Bansal restrained the sale, manufacturing and advertising counterfeit dresses and outfits, replicas of Mishra's designs, under the registered trademark “Rahul Mishra”, in any manner including internet and e-commerce platforms.Co-Accused Can Apply Separately For Compounding Of Offences Committed By Company Or HUF Under Income Tax Act: Delhi High CourtCase title: Sumit Bharana v. UoICitation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 4The Delhi High Court has held that co-accused are entitled to apply separately for compounding of offences committed by a Company or a Hindu Undivided Family under the Income Tax Act, 1961.A division bench of Acting Chief Justice Vibhu Bakhru and Justice Tushar Rao Gedela ruled that the co-accused need not await filing of application for compounding by the company or the HUF.Commissioner Cannot Use Its Power U/S 107(2) CGST Act To Review Order Passed By Appellate Authority: Delhi High CourtCase title: M/S G.S Industries v. Commissioner Of Central Tax And Gst, Delhi (West)Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 5The Delhi High Court has made it clear that a Commissioner under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act 2017 cannot, in purported exercise of its powers under Section 107(2), sit in appeal over an order passed by the Appellate Authority.Section 107(2) empowers the Commissioner to call for and examine the record of any proceedings in which an adjudicating authority has passed any order, for the purpose of satisfying himself of its legality.Reassessment U/S 150 Of Income Tax Act Can't Be Initiated On Mere 'Incidental' Findings Of Appellate Authority: Delhi High CourtCase title: The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax - Central -1 v. Capital Power Systems Ltd.Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 6The Delhi High Court has held that Section 150 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 can be invoked for reassessment only to give effect to a 'conclusive finding' by an appellate authority regarding escapement of income by an assessee.Section 150 makes provision for cases where assessment is in pursuance of an order on appeal, etc. It empowers an Assessing Officer to issue reassessment notice under Section 148, to give effect to any finding or direction contained in an order passed by any authority in any appeal, reference or revision under the Act.Delhi High Court Directs Social Media Platform To Take Down Clips Of Mirchi's Kareena Kapoor-Khan Talk Show In Copyright Infringement ClaimCase title: Entertainment Network India Limited vs. Miss Malini Entertainment PrivateCitation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 7The Delhi High Court has granted a temporary injunction in favour of the radio broadcaster, Entertainment Network, against alleged copyright infringement by the entertainment platform, Miss Malini Entertainment, in relation to the interview conducted by the platform for promotion of the talk show 'What Women Want'.Entertainment Network India Limited (plaintiff) produces and broadcasts audio and audio-visual content under brand names such as Mirchi and Mirchi Plus. It stated that it has sole and exclusive ownership rights of the talk show hosted by actor Kareena Kapoor-Khan.Customs Dept Should Serve Notices By Email In Addition To Post, Will Prevent Delay And Non-Appearances: Delhi High CourtCase title: Bonanza Enterprises v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Customs & Anr.Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 8The Delhi High Court recently called upon the Customs Department to make use of Section 153(c) of the Customs Act, 1962 which empowers it to serve notices through email.A division bench of Justices Prathiba M. Singh and Amit Sharma ...

Delhi High Court Annual Digest 2025: Part I [Citations 1 - 450]

Nupur Thapliyal

Tags