Merely Being Director Or MD Does Not Attract Liability Under Drug And Cosmetics Act Without Specific Allegations: J&K&L High Court

The Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh High Court has held that merely being a Managing Director or Director of a company does not make a person liable for prosecution under the Drug and Cosmetics Act, 1940, in the absence of specific allegations ascribing a role in the commission of the offence. The Court clarified that the presumption under Section 34 of the Act arises only against the...

Unpublished Wakaf Survey Report Does Not Attain Finality, Only Gazette-Published List Is Conclusive: J&K&L High Court

The Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh High Court has held that a survey report submitted by a Special Officer under the Wakaf Act does not attain finality unless it is forwarded to the concerned committee and published in the Government Gazette. The Court clarified that what becomes conclusive and final is the list of wakafs published in the Gazette, not the observations or recommendations made...

Disciplinary Authority Cannot Review It's Own Decision In Concluded Enquiry Without Express Provisions: J&K&L High Court

The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh has held that a disciplinary authority cannot review or revisit its earlier decision taken based on an enquiry report unless the applicable service rules expressly confer such power, and any subsequent attempt to reopen the matter would be legally unsustainable.The Court was hearing two connected writ petitions challenging the imposition...

Magistrate Can Direct Further Investigation Even At Post-Cognizance Stage U/S 173(8) CrPC: J&K&L High Court

The Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh High Court has held that a Magistrate or Special Court has the power to direct further investigation in a case where the investigation conducted is defective or certain aspects have not been properly investigated, and such a direction can be issued even after cognizance has been taken, by invoking Section 173(8) read with Section 156(3) of the Code of...

Jammu & Kashmir And Ladakh High Court Weekly Roundup: March 30 - April 5, 2026

Nominal Index:Rubeena Begum Vs Union Territory of Jammu & Kashmir & Ors 2026 LiveLaw (JKL) 122Babu Ram & Ors. Vs Kewal Krishan 2026 LiveLaw (JKL) 123Divisional Manager, J&K State Forest Corporation v. Satish Kumar 2026 LiveLaw (JKL) 124Fatima Bano v. State of J&K & Ors 2026 LiveLaw (JKL) 125Amit Kumar v. Union of India & Ors 2026 LiveLaw (JKL) 126Petitioner Vs...

Wakaf Includes Wakaf By User, Religious Properties Like Rauza Or Ziarat Do Not Require Proof Of Dedication: J&K&L High Court

The Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh High Court has held that the definition of Wakaf under the Jammu & Kashmir Wakaf Act, 1978 includes not only properties permanently dedicated by a person professing Islam but also Wakaf by user, such as Masjid, Dargah, Khankah, Maqbara, Rauza, Mausoleum, and Ziarat. The Court clarified that such religious properties do not require any formal dedication to...

Historical Books Can't Prove Private Property Title; S.57 Evidence Act Limited To Matters Of Public History: J&K&L High Court

The Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh High Court has held that while courts may, under Section 57 of the Evidence Act, resort to appropriate books or documents of reference on matters of public history, the question whether a person holds title to a particular property cannot be treated as a matter of public history. Historical works cannot be used to establish title to property, as such...

Jammu & Kashmir And Ladakh High Court Monthly Digest: March 2026

Nominal Index:Noushad Ahmad Vs Union of India 2026 LiveLaw (JKL) 80Anoop Uppal Vs Jammu Municipal Corporation 2026 LiveLaw (JKL) 81State Of J&K Vs Javaid Ahmad Ganai 2026 LiveLaw (JKL) 82Mahavir Singh @ Appu v. UT of J&K & Ors 2026 LiveLaw (JKL) 83Akhand Prakash Shahi vs. Union of India & Ors 2026 LiveLaw (JKL) 84Sham Lal v. State of J&K & Ors 2026 LiveLaw (JKL)...

Inquiry Officer Acting As Prosecutor, Denying Cross-Examination Vitiates Departmental Proceedings: J&K&L High Court

The Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh High Court has held that while there is no legal requirement to appoint a Presenting Officer in every departmental enquiry, the proceedings are vitiated if the Inquiry Officer assumes the role of a prosecutor, denies the delinquent employee the right to cross-examine witnesses, and creates a reasonable apprehension of bias.The bench of Justice Sanjay...

Pre-Arrest Bail Not Barred Under SC/ST Act If Prima Facie Ingredients Of Offence Are Not Disclosed: J&K&L High Court

The Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh High Court has held that the bar against anticipatory bail under Sections 18 and 18A of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 is not absolute. If a prima facie reading of the FIR or complaint does not disclose the essential ingredients constituting an offence under the Act, courts can grant pre-arrest bail.The Court...

“Long Incarceration Tilts Balance In Favour Of Liberty”: J&K&L High Court Grants Bail To Accused In Murder Case After 9 Years Custody

The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh has granted bail to a murder accused who had remained in custody for over nine years, holding that prolonged incarceration, when weighed against the fundamental right to liberty under Article 21 of the Constitution, tilts the balance in favour of release.The Court was hearing a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya...

Mere Abuse Or Uttering Caste Name Not Offence Under SC/ST Act: J&K&L High Court

The Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh High Court has held that for an offence under Section 3(1)(s) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 to be made out, it is not sufficient that the accused merely abuses a member of a Scheduled Caste or Scheduled Tribe or merely utters a caste name. The Court clarified that the essential requirement is that the...