Jammu & Kashmir And Ladakh High Court Weekly Roundup December 15 - December 21, 2025

Nominal Index:Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agriculture Sciences and Technology and another Vs Dr Robinder Nath Koul & Ors 2025 LiveLaw (JKL) 319Abdul Majeed Parray & Ors Vs UT Of J&K 2025 LiveLaw (JKL) 320Tafazul Fazili Vs Sabzar Ahmad Bandh 2025 LiveLaw (JKL) 321UT of J&K vs Som Raj 2025 LiveLaw (JKL) 322Vikas Dhar Vs Financial Commissioner Revenue & Ors 2025 LiveLaw (JKL) 323Akhand Prakash Shahi Vs Union of India 2025 LiveLaw (JKL) 324Mian Abdul Qayoom Vs UT Of J&K 2025 LiveLaw (JKL) 325Pyare Lal Bhat & Ors Vs UT Of J&K 2025 LiveLaw (JKL) 326Ghulam Mohi-ud-Din Sheikh Vs State of J&K 2025 LiveLaw (JKL) 327Radha Krishen Vs UT of J&K 2025 LiveLaw (JKL) 328Vikas Bharti Vs Punjab National Bank 2025 LiveLaw (JKL) 329District Kathua Cricket Association & others Vs Board of Control for Cricket in India and others 2025 LiveLaw (JKL) 330HAKEEM IRFAN AND ORS VS. CHAIRMAN J&K BANK Ltd. AND ORS 2025 LiveLaw (JKL) 331Judgments/Orders Migrant Status Cannot Dilute Career Progression Once Eligibility Is Met: J&K&L High Court Upholds Retrospective CAS PromotionsCase Title: Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agriculture Sciences and Technology and another Vs Dr Robinder Nath Koul & OrsCitation: 2025 LiveLaw (JKL) 319The Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh High Court held that migrant status cannot be used to dilute career progression once eligibility for promotion is established under statutory rules.Pension | Employees Of Different Institutions Cannot Claim Parity In Service Merely Because Both Are Funded From Same Source: J&K&L High CourtCase Title: Abdul Majeed Parray & Ors Vs UT Of J&KCitation: 2025 LiveLaw (JKL) 320The Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh High Court held that employees of two different institutions cannot claim parity in service conditions merely because both are funded from the same source.Justice Sanjay Dhar made this observation while dismissing a batch of writ petitions filed by serving and retired employees of J&K Sainik School who had sought extension of pensionary benefits on par with government employees and employees of other Sainik Schools across the country.S.143A NI Act Orders Not Interlocutory In Nature, Amenable To Revision Before Session's Court: J&K&L High CourtCase Title: Tafazul Fazili Vs Sabzar Ahmad BandhCitation: 2025 LiveLaw (JKL) 321Reinforcing the procedural safeguards available to both complainants and accused in cheque dishonour cases, the Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh High Court has held that an order passed by a Magistrate on an application under Section 143A of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 is not an interlocutory order but an intermediate order, and therefore amenable to revision before the Sessions Court.Denying Regularisation To Daily Wager After Extracting Work For Over 34 Years Is Illegal, Inequitable: J&K&L High CourtCase-Title: UT of J&K vs Som RajCitation: 2025 LiveLaw (JKL) 322The Jammu, Kashmir & Ladakh High Court dismissed the Union Territory's challenge to the regularisation of a daily wager, holding that denial of regularisation after extracting work for more than three decades would be illegal, inequitable, and contrary to the welfare obligations of the State.Revisional Powers Must Be Exercised Within Reasonable Time Even In Fraud Cases; Merits Cannot Justify Gross Delay: J&K&L High CourtCase Title: Vikas Dhar Vs Financial Commissioner Revenue & OrsCitation: 2025 LiveLaw (JKL) 323The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh quashed an order of the Financial Commissioner (Revenue) which had reopened and annulled revenue mutations after more than four decades.Justice Javed Iqbal Wani, while allowing a writ petition, held that revisional powers whether invoked in cases of fraud or otherwise must be exercised within a reasonable period, and that merits of a case cannot be used as a justification to condone gross delay.BSF Rules | Court Of Inquiry Is Preliminary Fact Finding Exercise, Not Disciplinary Trial Which Can Cause Prejudice: J&K&L High CourtCase Title: Akhand Prakash Shahi Vs Union of IndiaCitation: 2025 LiveLaw (JKL) 324The Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh High Court held that such an inquiry is only a fact-finding mechanism intended to assist authorities in deciding the future course of action and does not amount to initiation of departmental proceedings.J&K&L High Court Rejects Medical Bail Plea Of Former Bar President Mian Abdul Qayoom, Says He Is Provided Specialised TreatmentCase Title: Mian Abdul Qayoom Vs UT Of J&KCitation: 2025 LiveLaw (JKL) 325The Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh High Court dismissed the appeal filed by former Bar Association President Mian Abdul Qayoom seeking bail on medical and humanitarian grounds, holding that the record clearly demonstrates that he has been all along being provided with the advance and specialised treatment whenever necessitated and that no life-threatening medical emergency exists warranting his release at this stage.'Fought For Justice, Got Justice, Then Lost Justice': J&K&L High Court Restores Seniority Of 1979 Police Recruits After...

Jammu & Kashmir And Ladakh High Court Weekly Roundup December 15 - December 21, 2025

LIVELAW NEWS NETWORK

Tags