LiveLaw Delhi High Court Monthly Digest: September 2026 [Citations 795 - 938]
Citations 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 795 to 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 938NOMINAL INDEXX v/s UNIVERSITY OF DELHI 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 795Bhisham Mehta v. Mrs. Gita Vig & Ors. 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 796INDU PRAKASH SINGH v/s GOVERNMENT OF THE NATIONAL CAPITAL TERRITORY OF DELHI AND ORS 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 797Striker Beverages Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. v. State NCT of Delhi 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 798ANOOP GEORGE CHAUDHARI...
Citations 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 795 to 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 938
NOMINAL INDEX
X v/s UNIVERSITY OF DELHI 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 795
Bhisham Mehta v. Mrs. Gita Vig & Ors. 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 796
INDU PRAKASH SINGH v/s GOVERNMENT OF THE NATIONAL CAPITAL TERRITORY OF DELHI AND ORS 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 797
Striker Beverages Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. v. State NCT of Delhi 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 798
ANOOP GEORGE CHAUDHARI v/s STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 799
Rakhi Bisht v. UoI 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 800
Utimaco Technologies Pvt Ltd. v. UoI 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 801
SHIVDHAR UPADHYAY v. UNION OF INDIA AND ANR 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 802
SANJAY DANGI v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS & Other Connected Matter 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 803
UNIVERSITY OF DELHI AND ANR v. DEEPAK AND ORS 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 804
ADITYA CHAUHAN v. Bar councillor India & ORS 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 805
Taaran Chandna v. Union of India & Ors 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 806
Gopala Krishna Kosaraju v. Union of India & Ors 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 807
STATE v. MUNNA KUMAR 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 808
INDIAN COUNCIL FOR AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH AND ANR v. MR. KRISHAN KUMAR PASI 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 809
DEVENDER YADAV & ANR v. ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA & ANR 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 810
ANANYA RATURI & ANR v. Delhi University & Ors 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 811
CMYK Printech Limited v. K Kavitha & Ors 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 812
KAMRAN ASHRAF RESHI v. NIA & other connected matter 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 813
BRIJ SHARADBHAI BHATT AND ORS v. NATIONAL MEDICAL COMMISSION AND ORS 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 814
KXXXXX v. THE STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 815
M.K. STEPHEN v. THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 816
DESALEGN ATNAFU ABEBA v. NCB 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 817
SHRI AMIT KUMAR@DABBOO v. STATE NCT OF DELHI 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 818
RAMAN SONI v. CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 819
Justice on Trial v. BBC 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 820
DR RAJ SHEKHAWAT v. GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 821
SWATANTRA BHARDWAJ THROUGH HIS FATHER RANDHIR KUMAR JHA v. STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 822
ANIKET KUMAR GUPTA v. GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 823
NATIONAL STUDENTS' UNION OF INDIA v. UNION OF INDIA & ANR 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 824
Dhananjay Nivrutti Lokhande v. CBI 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 825
SANDEEP KUMAR v. STATE OF NCT OF DELHI 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 826
DILBAGH SINGH v. DEEPAK GANDHI 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 827
POONAM v. STATE NCT OF DELHI 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 828
PROF SUJATA ASHWARYA v. JAMIA MILLIA ISLAMIA & ORS 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 829
ALL INDIA CARROM FEDERATION v. UNION OF INDIA & ANR 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 830
UNION OF INDIA v. MITHAI LAL AND ORS & other connected matter 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 831
HURBA PETRO AND OTHERS v. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 832
Union of India & Ors. v. Sh. Jamuna Dass 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 833
Gaurav Bhatia v. Saurav Das & Ors 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 834
DEVENDER YADAV & ANR v. ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA & ANR 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 835
Neha v. UoI 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 836
Rajinder Kumar Gupta v. The Chief Secretary, Government of NCT Delhi and Ors. 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 837
Sanmati Sabha (Regd.) v. Delhi Development Authority & Ors. 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 838
Vinesh Phogat v/s Wrestling Federation of India & Ors 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 839
P B AGRO LLP v. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 840
AJAY KUMAR v. STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & other connected matter 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 841
SHIVAM GUPTA v. THE STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 842
ANISH SANDEEP PATIL (MINOR) THROUGH HIS FATHER SANDEEP HEMANT PATIL v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 843
X v. Y 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 844
MINOR S THR HER GUARDIAN B v. STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 845
MS. FAIZAL & ANR v. STATE (GNCT) OF DELHI & ANR 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 846
HARERAM v. STATE OF DELHI 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 847
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax, Central-1, Delhi v. Patanjali Ayurved Limited & other connected matters 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 848
Kanhaiya Ranjan and Anr v. Campus Law Centre & Ors & other connected matters 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 849
AKASH & ANR v. STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) & ORS 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 850
Ravi Kant Thakral v. Bank Of Baroda 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 851
Nitin Naresh v. Union of India & Ors [WP (C) 13480/2026] 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 852
Advocate Ramkishan Saraswat v. Union of India & Anr 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 853
Nitin Soni Advocate v. Honble High Court of Delhi through its Registrar General & Ors 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 854
VIJETA v/s UNION OF INDIA AND ORS 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 855
Mohammad Saqib@ Saqib Iftekar v. NI 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 856
PARVESH MANN @ SAGAR v. STATE (NCT OF DELHI) 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 857
ANWAR HUSSAIN v. STATE NCT OF DELHI 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 858
Union of India v. CHRI 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 859
PRASHANT KUMAR SINGH v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 860
Jai Anshul Anil Ambani v. Bureau of Immigration & Anr 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 861
KUSHAGRA DUA & ORS v. THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 862
AMIT KHANNA v. STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 863
JAGTAR SINGH JOHAL @ JAGGI v. NIA 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 864
MEENAKSHI CHAUDHARY v. JOHN DOE & Ors 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 865
AQUIL AHMED v. NATIONAL INVESTIGATION AGENCY THROUGH THE CHIEF INVESTIGATING OFFICER 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 866
Prashant Manchanda v. Union of India & Ors 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 867
FARHAN ANSAR SUSE (IN JC) v. NIA 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 868
PUNEET BATRA v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 869
ANJANA GOSAIN v. GNCTD & other connected matter 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 870
P BALASUBRAMANIYAN v. SHRI VINAY KUMAR GUPTA 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 871
MR C ARJUN & ORS v. JAWAHARLAL NEHRU UNIVERSITY 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 872
MANISH KUMAR PRASAD v. STATE OF NCT OF DELHI 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 873
KRISHAN LAL v. INDERJEET SINGH & ANOTHER 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 874
S v. STATE (GOVT. NCT OF DELHI) & ANR 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 875
VAASVI KHAITAN MINOR THROUGH HER FATHER MR VEDANT KHAITAN v. AD-HOC COMMITTEE FOR THE GOVERNANCE OF EQUESTRIAN FEDERATION OF INDIA & ORS 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 876
COURT ON ITS OWN MOTION v. ADEESHWAR SINGHAL 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 877
MEENAL AGARWAL & ANR v. STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 878
SANJAY SACHDEVA v. BHOLA MAHATO & ORS (M/S RELIANCE GENERAL INSRUANCE CO LTD) 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 879
B v. N 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 880
SOCIAL JURIST, A CIVIL RIGHTS GROUP v. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 881
Naveen Kumar Verma & Anr. v. State 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 882
VEER PAL v. STATE 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 883
Nazre Alam @ Ravi & Anr v. State 2026 LiveLa4 (Del) 884
KUNAL YADAV & ORS v. MANAN KUMAR MISHRA & ORS 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 885
Ghanshyam D. Uphadhyay v. Union of India & Ors. 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 886
Pappu Singh v. State NCT of Delhi 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 887
LOVKESH BAJAJ v. STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 888
ASHWIKA SINGHAL v. UNION OF INDIA THROUGH SECRETARY & ORS 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 889
MUSKAN RATHI v. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 890
SMT. MEENA DEVI AND ANR v. THE STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) AND ORS 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 891
NINA PRASAD v. STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 892
CBI v. Chitra Ramakrishna & other connected matter 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 893
Anita v. Punjab and Sind Bank 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 894
KAMLESH SHARMA v. NEETA BHARDWAJ & ORS 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 895
BSES YAMUNA POWER LIMITED v. MOHD. GULZAR & ANR 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 896
Ami Sisodia v. GNCTD & Ors 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 897
INDUS BIRRA BEVERAGES & ORS v. ISHAAN ASSOCIATES 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 898
Students' Federation of India & Anr v. Union of India & Anr 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 899
GURMEET SINGH @ HARPREET SINGH v. STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 900
DR MANISH KAMRA v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 901
Ajeet Bharti v. State 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 902
ANAND SINGH RAWAT v. THE STATE AND ANOTHER & ANR 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 903
MASTER SHUBH CHOWDHARI THROUGH HIS FATHER v. EQUESTRIAN FEDERATION OF INDIA & ORS and other connected matter 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 904
M/S HITECH ENTERPRISES v. M/S MODERN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY DELHI 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 905
MASASASONG AO v. ED 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 906
SUMIT SHAKYA v. STATEOFNCT OF DELHI & ANR 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 907
United Forum of Bank Unions Delhi State v. Union of India & Ors 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 908
RAJNISH GUPTA v. CBI & other connected matter 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 909
X v. State NCT of Delhi & Ors 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 910
SMT.SIMRAN KAUR v. STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI ) 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 911
Union Of India & Ors. v. Himanshi & 34 Ors 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 912
Equitas Small Finance Bank Ltd. v. Mrs Nirmala Bai Shanthilal & Ors 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 913
Shahbuddin v. State 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 914
Anil Ahluwalia v. State NCT of Delhi 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 915
ASHISH ALIES VICKY v. STATE OF NCT OF DELHI 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 916
Manoj Chaudhary v. State NCT of Delhi 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 917
AARTI KAKKAR & ORS v. DINESH MEHAN & ANR 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 918
AYUSH KUMAR & ANR v. NATIONAL TESTING AGENCY & ORS and Other Connected Matters 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 919
Ms G v. State NCT of Delhi & Anr 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 920
HARCHARAN SINGH BHALLA v. THE STATE GOVT. OF NCT DELHI 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 921
LALIT PANDEY v. SANJAY AGARWAL 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 922
DR VIKAS DIVYAKIRTI v. META PLATFORMS INC & ORS 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 923
SOUTH INDIAN BANK LTD AND UNION BANK OF INDIA LTD. THROUGH SOUTH INDIAN BANK LTD. IN ITS CAPACITY AS THE LENDERS REPRESENTATIVE v. NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 924
Red Bull v. Union of India & Ors 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 925
BPTP LIMITED v. NITIN NARESH & ORS 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 926
BISHMEET KAUR v. GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 927
Bilal & Anr v. The State Govt Of Nct Of Delhi Through Sho & Ors. 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 928
M/S Mk Wholesale v. ICICI Bank Ltd. & Ors 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 929
Umar Khalid v. State & other connected matter 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 930
VIJAY SHANKAR MEENA v. UNIVERSITY OF DELHI AND ORS 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 931
Tahir Hussain v. State 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 932
Mahan Swatantrata Senani Lalti Ram Trust v. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 933
SHRI SANATAN DHARAM RAMLEELA SAMITI v. DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ORS 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 934
SACHIN CHAUDHARY v. DELHI STATE LEGAL SERVICES AUTHORITY & ANR 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 935
NAIM @MOHD. NAEEM v. NATIONAL INVESTIGATION AGENCY 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 936
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY v. MALA SAHNI SETH & ANR And other connected matters 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 937
Sanam Dagar v. State (NCT of Delhi) 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 938
Student Must Be Caught 'Actually Using' Cheating Material For Major Penalty: Delhi High Court
Case title: X v/s UNIVERSITY OF DELHI
Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 795
The Delhi High Court modified the punishment of a law student who was accused of cheating inside a urinal, after noting that he was entitled to benefit of doubt as nothing was shown to prove that he was found 'actually using' the material for cheating and so the penalty of cancelling all his papers in the semester was disporportionate.
Case title: Bhisham Mehta v. Mrs. Gita Vig & Ors.
Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 796
The Delhi High Court has held that a General Power of Attorney (GPA) is an instrument of agency and does not transfer right, title or interest in an immovable property to the attorney holder.
Case title: INDU PRAKASH SINGH v/s GOVERNMENT OF THE NATIONAL CAPITAL TERRITORY OF DELHI AND ORS
Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 797
The Delhi High Court has dismissed PIL seeking directions to ensure the inclusion of homeless persons and those rendered homeless or displaced due to demolition drives in the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls in the national capital.
Case title: Striker Beverages Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. v. State NCT of Delhi
Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 798
The Delhi High Court has quashed an FIR registered under Section 33 of the Delhi Excise Act, 2009 against a liquor and beverages company, after finding that the omission to obtain a one-day liquor permit for a soft launch party was an inadvertent mistake.
Case title: ANOOP GEORGE CHAUDHARI v/s STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH
Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 799
The Delhi High Court has directed the State of Madhya Pradesh to pay Rs. 78,65,000 along with interest of 9% per annum to senior advocate Anoop George Chaudhari for appearing before the Supreme Court in a matter, rejecting the State's claim that the senior counsel had effectively appeared only twice.
Case title: Rakhi Bisht v. UoI
Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 800
The Delhi High Court has held that the statutory protection available to women during maternity leave is not confined to continuity of employment or wages, but extends to their professional status, responsibilities, managerial authority and prospects of career advancement.
Case title: Utimaco Technologies Pvt Ltd. v. UoI
Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 801
The Delhi High Court has upheld the Centre's decision to appoint the Centre for Development of Telematics (C-DOT) as the sole agency for implementing a nationwide Cell Broadcasting system, which is designed to send emergency alerts directly to people's mobile phones during disasters and other public emergencies.
Title: SHIVDHAR UPADHYAY v. UNION OF INDIA AND ANR
Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 802
The Delhi High Court has held that a victim of an offence can prefer an appeal against an order of acquittal or conviction for a lesser offence under the proviso to Section 372 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), without being required to seek leave to appeal, unlike the State or a complainant challenging an order of acquittal.
Title: SANJAY DANGI v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS & Other Connected Matter
Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 803
The Delhi High Court has observed that applications seeking temporary suspension of Look out Circular (LOC) for foreign travel should, in the first instance, be moved before the competent Special Court seized of the prosecution complaint.
Title: UNIVERSITY OF DELHI AND ANR v. DEEPAK AND ORS
Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 804
The Delhi High Court has held that a University can keep appointments in abeyance pending an enquiry into suspected use of unfair means in a public recruitment examination, particularly where the material discloses serious doubts as to whether the declared merit list reflects genuine merit.
Title: ADITYA CHAUHAN v. Bar councillor India & ORS
Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 805
The Delhi High Court has asked the Bar Council of Delhi (BCD) to decide a plea seeking removal or masking of advocates' personal information, including residential addresses, mobile numbers, dates of birth and parents' names, from its publicly accessible online “Enrolment Status” portal.
Title: Taaran Chandna v. Union of India & Ors
Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 806
The Delhi High Court on Wednesday directed the authorities to consider and take appropriate steps to ensure compliance of an advisory issued by the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) on handling of arrests and detention, including imprisonment and search, involving transgender persons.
Title: Gopala Krishna Kosaraju v. Union of India & Ors
Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 807
The Delhi High Court refused to entertain a plea against the closure of Visakhapatnam Airport for commercial flights. A division bench comprising Chief Justice DK Upadhyaya and Justice Tejas Karia said that the petitioner, Gopala Krishna Kosaraju, should approach the Andhra Pradesh High Court raising his grievance.
Title: STATE v. MUNNA KUMAR
Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 808
The Delhi High Court has observed that the testimony of a child victim of sexual assault cannot be assessed by placing undue emphasis on technical, legal or medical terminology.
Title: INDIAN COUNCIL FOR AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH AND ANR v. MR. KRISHAN KUMAR PASI
Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 809
The Delhi High Court has questioned a predecessor Bench's approach of quizzing a litigant during proceedings concerning the withholding of his exam result for recruitment to the post of Assistant in the Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR).
Title: DEVENDER YADAV & ANR v. ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA & ANR
Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 810
The Delhi High Court held that a booth level agent (BLA) can only be made liable for verifying that the photograph in the enumeration form matches with the identity of electors in relation to the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) exercise in the national capital.
Title: ANANYA RATURI & ANR v. Delhi University & Ors
Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 811
The Delhi High Court said that anyone, who is in a position to pay Rs. 1 lakh in terms of Delhi University's mandate, including guardian, can stand as a surety for the students contesting the Delhi University Students' Union (DUSU) elections, and not necessarily only parents.
Title: CMYK Printech Limited v. K Kavitha & Ors
Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 812
The Delhi High Court restrained Telangana Rakshana Sena (TRS) leader K Kavitha and various others, including YouTube channels, from publishing any content containing imputations and allegations against “The Pioneer” newspaper.
Title: KAMRAN ASHRAF RESHI v. NIA & other connected matter
Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 813
The Delhi High Court on Thursday granted bail to two accused in an alleged Jammu and Kashmir terror conspiracy case registered by the National Investigation Agency (NIA).
Foreign Medical Degrees Must Be Authenticated For Candidates To Appear In FMGE: Delhi High Court
Title: BRIJ SHARADBHAI BHATT AND ORS v. NATIONAL MEDICAL COMMISSION AND ORS
Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 814
The Delhi High Court has upheld the requirement of authentication of foreign medical degrees to enable the candidates to appear in the Foreign Medical Graduate Examination (FMGE).
Title: KXXXXX v. THE STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR
Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 815
The Delhi High Court has observed that DNA evidence establishes sexual intercourse between an accused and a prosecutrix but does not establish whether the relationship was consensual or non-consensual.
Title: M.K. STEPHEN v. THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS
Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 816
The Delhi High Court has quashed criminal proceedings arising out of a quarrel between friends after they amicably settled their differences, observing that continuation of the case would serve no meaningful purpose and only perpetuate discord and animosity.
Title: DESALEGN ATNAFU ABEBA v. NCB
Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 817
The Delhi High Court has flagged assigning of two legal-aid advocates to the same accused in a bail matter, observing that such an arrangement results in “double expenditure on the exchequer.”
Title: SHRI AMIT KUMAR@DABBOO v. STATE NCT OF DELHI
Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 818
The Delhi High Court has held that the seriousness of an offence cannot eclipse the constitutional guarantee of a speedy trial, while granting bail to a man who remained incarcerated for more than 13 years while facing trial in a case alleging kidnapping and murder of two minor children.
Trial Court Can Summon Witness After Reserving Judgment When Evidence Is Necessary: Delhi High Court
Title: RAMAN SONI v. CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 819
The Delhi High Court has held that a trial court is not barred from exercising powers under Section 311 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) to summon or recall a witness, after reserving judgment, where the evidence is considered necessary for a just decision of the case.
PM Modi Documentary: Gujarat Based NGO Withdraws Defamation Suit Against BBC From Delhi High Court
Title: Justice on Trial v. BBC
Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 820
A Gujarat-based NGO has withdrawn from the Delhi High Court its defamation suit filed against British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) in 2023 over a documentary on Prime Minister Narendra Modi.
Justice Tushar Rao Gedela allowed the withdrawal on September 03 after the NGO's counsel said that he has instructions to withdraw the suit, with liberty to file fresh suit for the same cause of action.
Title: DR RAJ SHEKHAWAT v. GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS
Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 821
The Delhi High Court asked the Delhi Police to decide a plea seeking permission to hold a peaceful protest at Jantar Mantar on September 20 opposing the recently notified University Grants Commission (Promotion of Equity in Higher Education Institutions) Regulations, 2026.
Delhi High Court Rejects Swatantra Bhardwaj's Plea Against Arrest In CJP Protester Assault Case
Title: SWATANTRA BHARDWAJ THROUGH HIS FATHER RANDHIR KUMAR JHA v. STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS
Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 822
The Delhi High Court rejected a habeas corpus plea filed by Swatantra Bhardwaj in relation to his arrest in an alleged assault case relating to father of a teenage Cockroach Janta Party (CJP) activist during Jantar Mantar protest in July.
Title: ANIKET KUMAR GUPTA v. GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS
Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 823
The Delhi High Court asked the authorities to double their efforts to save the lives of students affected by the collapse of a five-storeyed PG or hostel building at city's Satya Niketan area.
A division bench comprising Chief Justice DK Upadhyaya and Justice Tejas Karia noted the assurance given by SGI Tushar Mehta, appearing for Union Government, Delhi Police and Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD), that all possible steps are being taken and that the rescue operation is carried out in full swing.
Title: NATIONAL STUDENTS' UNION OF INDIA v. UNION OF INDIA & ANR
Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 824
The Delhi High Court rejected a PIL filed by National Students' Union of India (NSUI) alleging “large scale irregularities and deficiencies” under the newly introduced On-Screen Marking (OSM) system by the Central Board of Secondary Education (CBSE). [2026 LiveLaw (Del) 824]
NEET-UG Paper Leak: Delhi High Court Dismisses Accused's Challenge To Arrest With ₹25K Costs
Title: Dhananjay Nivrutti Lokhande v. CBI
Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 825
The Delhi High Court has dismissed a plea filed by Dhananjay Nivrutti Lokhande, an accused in relation to the National Eligibility cum Entrance Test-Undergraduate (NEET-UG) paper leak case, challenging his arrest.
A division bench comprising Justice Navin Chawla and Justice Ravinder Dudeja rejected the plea, observing that it was an abuse of process of law.
Title: SANDEEP KUMAR v. STATE OF NCT OF DELHI
Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 826
The Delhi High Court has denied bail to a man accused of murdering his live-in partner and subsequently cremating her body without informing her parents or getting a medical examination or post-mortem conducted.
Title: DILBAGH SINGH v. DEEPAK GANDHI
Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 827
The Delhi High Court has waived costs of Rs. 25,000 imposed on a litigant after his counsel remained unavailable for cross-examination due to pregnancy-related medical circumstances.
Justice Ajay Digpaul observed that the lawyer's advised bed rest constituted “sufficient cause” for the absence before the trial court.
Plea Challenging Order In Divorce Proceedings Not Maintainable Against State: Delhi High Court
Title: POONAM v. STATE NCT OF DELHI
Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 828
The Delhi High Court has held that an appeal challenging an order passed in divorce proceedings cannot be maintained against the State.
A Division Bench comprising Justice Vivek Chaudhary and Justice Renu Bhatnagar was dealing with a plea filed by a wife who had filed the appeal against the State even though the husband's pleadings and conduct formed the subject matter of the proceedings.
Delhi High Court Directs Jamia To Ensure Exclusive Toilet Facility For All Female Faculty Members
Title: PROF SUJATA ASHWARYA v. JAMIA MILLIA ISLAMIA & ORS
Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 829
The Delhi High Court has said that an exclusive toilet facility specially earmarked for female faculty members in the Jamia Millia Islamia (JMI) is to be used by all female faculty members, and no particular person shall be allowed to put any lock and key on it.
Delhi High Court Sets Aside Order Restraining Carrom Federation From Using 'India', 'Indian' In Name
Title: ALL INDIA CARROM FEDERATION v. UNION OF INDIA & ANR
Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 830
The Delhi High Court has set aside an order passed by the single judge restraining the All India Carrom Federation (AICF) from using the expression “India” or “Indian” in its name or logo or in the further competitions conducted by it.
Title: UNION OF INDIA v. MITHAI LAL AND ORS & other connected matter
Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 831
The Delhi High Court strongly criticised the Indian Railways for making low-paid commission vendors and bearers litigate for decades to secure their employment rights, observing that courts must protect the interests of weaker sections and persons drawing “paltry wages”.
Title: HURBA PETRO AND OTHERS v. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS
Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 832
The Delhi High Court has dismissed a plea filed by six Ukrainian nationals challenging the extension of their detention beyond 90 days and up to 180 days in a UAPA case concerning allegations of involvement in drone warfare-related activities for Myanmar-based ethnic armed groups.
Case Name : Union of India & Ors. v. Sh. Jamuna Dass
Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 833
A Division Bench of the Delhi High Court comprising Justice C. Hari Shankar and Justice Vinod Kumar held that under Rule 69(1)(c) of the CCS (Pension) Rules, 1972, gratuity cannot be paid until all pending judicial proceedings (including criminal appeals) are finally concluded, not just disciplinary proceedings.
Title: Gaurav Bhatia v. Saurav Das & Ors
Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 834
Cockroach Janta Party (CJP) leaders Saurav Das and Ashutosh Ranka told the Delhi High Court that they will delete social media posts against BJP leader and senior advocate Gaurav Bhatia, which purportedly falsely attributed to him that he described Swatantra Bhardwaj as a “dimagi naxali” and “jaatiwaadi.”
This, after Justice Tushar Rao Gedela orally suggested both Das and Ranka to take instructions on taking down the posts on X on their own.
Title: DEVENDER YADAV & ANR v. ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA & ANR
Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 835
The Delhi High Court on Thursday refused to entertain a plea challenging the Election Commission of India's requirement that certain voters affected by the ongoing Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls submit declarations stating that they are applying for inclusion in the electoral roll for the first time.
Delhi High Court Directs Nationwide Biometric Aadhaar Verification For GST Registrations
Case title: Neha v. UoI
Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 836
The Delhi High Court has ordered GST authorities across the country to ensure that no fresh GST registration is granted unless the applicant undergoes biometric-based Aadhaar authentication.
The division bench of Justices Anil Khetarpal and Shail Jain passed the order amid continuing problem of fraudulent GST registrations obtained by misusing PAN and Aadhaar particulars belonging to unsuspecting individuals.
Unproven Misconduct No Ground To Deny Back Wages Entirely; Delhi HC Grants 50% Relief
Case Name : Rajinder Kumar Gupta v. The Chief Secretary, Government of NCT Delhi and Ors.
Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 837
A Delhi High Court Bench comprising Justice Sanjeev Narula held that the Delhi School Education Rules, 1973, Rule 121 mandates that the Managing Committee must make a reasoned, fair determination on back wages upon reinstatement, and cannot deny wages based on unproven allegations or assumptions.
Case title: Sanmati Sabha (Regd.) v. Delhi Development Authority & Ors.
Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 838
The Delhi High Court has dismissed a plea seeking regularisation of a temple constructed on land earmarked for a nursery school, observing that the temple was constructed without sanction and contrary to the applicable rules governing disposal of government land.
Title: Vinesh Phogat v/s Wrestling Federation of India & Ors
Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 839
The Delhi High Court has refused interim relief to wrestler Vinesh Phogat seeking to participate in the women's selection trials for the 2026 Senior World Championships.
Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma was not inclined to grant an interim exemption from the eligibility criteria to allow Phogat to participate in the selection trials on September 14.
Title: P B AGRO LLP v. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS
Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 840
The Delhi High Court rejected a plea filed by makers of Vimal Elaichi seeking to quash show-cause notices issued to their brand ambassadors, Shah Rukh Khan, Ajay Devgn and Tiger Shroff, by the Maharashtra FDA for alleged misrepresentation of the product in their advertisement.
High Court Raps Delhi Police For Failure To Brief Prosecutor In Bail Matter, Directs DCP To Appear
Title: AJAY KUMAR v. STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & other connected matter
Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 841
The Delhi High Court has criticised the Delhi Police for failing to brief prosecutor in time in bail matters, observing that such lapses reflect how the police “appear to be treating” the issue of individual liberty.
Title: SHIVAM GUPTA v. THE STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI)
Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 842
The Delhi High Court has held that the gravity of an offence, by itself, is not an absolute bar on the grant of bail when the trial does not progress with reasonable expedition.
Title: ANISH SANDEEP PATIL (MINOR) THROUGH HIS FATHER SANDEEP HEMANT PATIL v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS
Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 843
The Delhi High Court has questioned the requirement for an NRI sponsor to establish that they had actually looked after a student as his or her guardian for the purpose of NRI quota admission following the NEET-UG examination.
Title: X v. Y
Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 844
The Delhi High Court has held that merely because a husband and wife have been living separately for several decades, the latter's statutory right to claim maintenance is not extinguished so long as the marriage continues to subsist.
Title: MINOR S THR HER GUARDIAN B v. STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR
Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 845
The Delhi High Court has observed that a minor rape survivor cannot be compelled to carry the pregnancy and deliver the child and has the right to decide it she wants to be a mother or not.
'Lackadaisical Attitude' Of Delhi Police Leads Public Witnesses To Turn Hostile: High Court
Title: MS. FAIZAL & ANR v. STATE (GNCT) OF DELHI & ANR
Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 846
The Delhi High Court has flagged the “lackadaisical attitude” of the police machinery over public witnesses frequently turning hostile to the prosecution case.
Title: HARERAM v. STATE OF DELHI
Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 847
The Delhi High Court has observed that while the consent of a minor is legally immaterial under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act, the minor's “approval-in-fact” to a physical relationship can be considered as a relevant circumstance while deciding an accused's bail plea.
Title: Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax, Central-1, Delhi v. Patanjali Ayurved Limited & other connected matters
Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 848
The Delhi High Court has criticized the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) for “procedural lapses”, lack of transparency and “undue haste” while passing an order disposing of seven appeals concerning Patanjali Ayurved Limited.
Title: Kanhaiya Ranjan and Anr v. Campus Law Centre & Ors & other connected matters
Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 849
The Delhi High Court on Tuesday granted relief to five students challenging the rejection of their nomination papers for two colleges in the Delhi University Students' Union elections 2026-2027.
Title: AKASH & ANR v. STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) & ORS
Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 850
The Delhi High Court has observed that no person, whether a witness or an accused, can be subjected to torture or cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment while in police custody.
Case title: Ravi Kant Thakral v. Bank Of Baroda
Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 851
The Delhi High Court has held that an employee's first placement in a Reserve List does not by itself create a right to promotion merely because vacancies arise during the validity of the list.
Case title: Nitin Naresh v. Union of India & Ors [WP (C) 13480/2026]
Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 852
The Delhi High Court today dismissed a PIL seeking fact-finding into lathi charge claims against Delhi Police during the NEET paper leak protest which took place at Jantar Mantar earlier in June, orally remarking that there was no public interest in the plea.
Title: Advocate Ramkishan Saraswat v. Union of India & Anr
Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 853
The Delhi High Court on Wednesday directed the Central Government to decide a representation challenging the September 21, 2026, deadline for private individuals and professionals to continue using FIPS 140-2 tokens for their Digital Signature Certificates (DSCs).
Title: Nitin Soni Advocate v. Honble High Court of Delhi through its Registrar General & Ors
Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 854
The Delhi High Court on Wednesday asked its appropriate Committee to consider a lawyer's suggestions on upgrading the hybrid hearings infrastructure in the district courts in the national capital.
Case title: VIJETA v/s UNION OF INDIA AND ORS
Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 855
The Delhi High Court on Wednesday (September 16) held that a student, being a member of a political party's student wing, is not barred from contesting Delhi University Students' Union (DUSU) polls.
Case title: Mohammad Saqib@ Saqib Iftekar v. NIA
Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 856
The Delhi High Court has granted bail to an accused in a case registered under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967, noting that he has remained in custody for nearly eight years and that the trial is unlikely to conclude anytime soon.
Title: PARVESH MANN @ SAGAR v. STATE (NCT OF DELHI)
Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 857
The Delhi High Court on Wednesday denied bail to a murder accused after finding that he had concealed the fact that his earlier bail applications had been rejected by another bench and sought transfer of the fresh bail plea to a different bench.
Title: ANWAR HUSSAIN v. STATE NCT OF DELHI
Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 858
The Delhi High Court has initiated contempt proceedings against a Tihar Jail Superintendent, holding that his conduct in preventing the release of an undertrial prisoner on parole amounted to a wilful violation of the judicial order.
Title: Union of India v. CHRI
Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 859
The Delhi High Court on Thursday asked the Central Government to file before a single judge an application seeking vacation of an interim order permitting the NGO Commonwealth Human Rights Initiative (CHRI) to withdraw Rs. 20 lakh from its own reserve/domestic funds.
Delhi High Court Asks CBFC To Decide Makers' Proposal To Replace 'Shoorveer' Song In Mirzapur Movie
Title: PRASHANT KUMAR SINGH v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS
Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 860
The Delhi High Court on Thursday directed the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC) to decide within a week, a proposal by the makers of Mirzapur: The Movie to replace the song 'Shoorveer' in the film's climax with background music.
Title: Jai Anshul Anil Ambani v. Bureau of Immigration & Anr
Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 861
The Delhi High Court on Thursday directed the Bureau of Immigration to inform Jai Anshul Ambani, son of industrialist Anil Ambani, whether any look out circular (LOC) is issued against him and is subsisting.
Title: KUSHAGRA DUA & ORS v. THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR
Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 862
The Delhi High Court has quashed an FIR registered against five persons for offences including attempt to culpable homicide and assault on public servant after the parties amicably settled their dispute.
Title: AMIT KHANNA v. STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI
Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 863
The Delhi High Court has denied bail to Amit Khanna, an accused in the Kanjhawala hit-and-run case in which a 20-year old girl was killed after she was dragged under a car for around 13 km.
Delhi High Court Grants Bail To British National Jagtar Singh Johal In Murder, UAPA Cases
Title: JAGTAR SINGH JOHAL @ JAGGI v. NIA
Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 864
The Delhi High Court on Friday granted bail to British national Jagtar Singh Johal in seven murder and UAPA cases being probed by the National Investigation Agency (NIA).
Title: MEENAKSHI CHAUDHARY v. JOHN DOE & Ors
Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 865
The Delhi High Court on Friday passed an ex parte ad interim injunction directing takedown of obscene and sexually explicit content posted against actress Meenakshi Chaudhary.
Order Confirming Attachment Of Property Under UAPA Appealable Under NIA Act: Delhi High Court
Title: AQUIL AHMED v. NATIONAL INVESTIGATION AGENCY THROUGH THE CHIEF INVESTIGATING OFFICER
Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 866
The Delhi High Court has held that an order passed under Section 25(6) of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 (UAPA), confirming seizure or attachment of property as “proceeds of terrorism”, can be challenged before the High Court under Section 21 of the National Investigation Agency Act, 2008 (NIA Act).
Title: Prashant Manchanda v. Union of India & Ors
Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 867
The Delhi High Court on Friday barred any kind of victory processions by the students organizations, candidates or anyone else in the ongoing Delhi University Students Union (DUSU) elections.
Title: FARHAN ANSAR SUSE (IN JC) v. NIA
Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 868
The Delhi High Court has granted custody bail for 30 days to an alleged ISIS operative to undergo surgery for an umbilical hernia at a private hospital of his choice in Delhi-NCR.
Title: PUNEET BATRA v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS
Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 869
The Delhi High Court has held that advocate-client privilege cannot operate as an absolute bar against an investigation into the conduct of the lawyer where the investigating authorities place prima facie material indicating that such an individual may have acted beyond the role of a legal adviser and may have been involved in the affairs under investigation.
Delhi High Court Directs Govt To Clear Pending Bills Of Lawyers, Fix Problems On Online Portal
Title: ANJANA GOSAIN v. GNCTD & other connected matter
Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 870
The Delhi High Court has directed the Delhi Government to take steps for expeditious clearance of bills submitted by lawyers appearing on behalf of the Government, after counsel complained of repeated queries, non-issuance of Brief Transmission Forms (BTFs) and lack of clarity over the status of their bills.
Advocate Can't Challenge BCI's Disciplinary Order In Criminal Proceedings: Delhi High Court
Title: P BALASUBRAMANIYAN v. SHRI VINAY KUMAR GUPTA
Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 871
The Delhi High Court has held that an order passed by the Bar Council of India (BCI) ordering disciplinary action against a lawyer can be challenged only by way of an appeal before the Supreme Court of India under Section 38 of the Advocates Act.
Title: MR C ARJUN & ORS v. JAWAHARLAL NEHRU UNIVERSITY
Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 872
The Delhi High Court has observed that university students have a valuable right to express dissent, demonstrate or show support for a demonstration, holding that merely smiling at protestors cannot be treated as an act of indiscipline.
Leaves, Seeds, Grass-Like Material Not 'Ganja' Under NDPS Act: Delhi High Court Grants Bail
Title: MANISH KUMAR PRASAD v. STATE OF NCT OF DELHI
Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 873
The Delhi High Court has held that a substance comprising “leafy, seed-bearing, grass-like” material does not fall within the definition of “ganja” under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985.
Title: KRISHAN LAL v. INDERJEET SINGH & ANOTHER
Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 874
The Delhi High Court has refused to condone a delay of 6,290 days, or over 17 years, in seeking restoration of an appeal filed in 1988, that was dismissed for non-prosecution in the year. 2002.
Title: S v. STATE (GOVT. NCT OF DELHI) & ANR
Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 875
The Delhi High Court has directed the police to provide protection to a 26-year-old woman advocate who alleged that she was facing threats, coercion and interference from her parents and relatives over her refusal to marry a person chosen by them.
Title: VAASVI KHAITAN MINOR THROUGH HER FATHER MR VEDANT KHAITAN v. AD-HOC COMMITTEE FOR THE GOVERNANCE OF EQUESTRIAN FEDERATION OF INDIA & ORS
Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 876
The Delhi High Court has directed the Equestrian Federation of India (EFI) to ensure greater clarity and transparency in its future selection processes, observing that uncertainty in selection procedures concerning athletes representing the country ought to be avoided.
Delhi High Court Directs Interpol's Red Corner Notice Against Man Facing Contempt For Abusing Judges
Title: COURT ON ITS OWN MOTION v. ADEESHWAR SINGHAL
Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 877
The Delhi High Court has directed the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) to issue a Red Corner Notice through INTERPOL against a man who is facing criminal contempt proceedings over allegations of threatening judges and making scandalous and abusive remarks against them.
Title: MEENAL AGARWAL & ANR v. STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR
Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 878
The Delhi High Court has refused to quash the summoning of two persons accused of assaulting and abusing a man at the Supreme Court premises and subsequently circulating a video of the incident on Instagram.
Title: SANJAY SACHDEVA v. BHOLA MAHATO & ORS (M/S RELIANCE GENERAL INSRUANCE CO LTD)
Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 879
The Delhi High Court has held that the Motor Accident Claims Tribunals (MACTs) cannot mechanically reject applications seeking release of compensation kept in fixed deposits and must consider the genuine requirements of claimants before deciding whether the amount should be released.
Case title: B v. N
Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 880
The Delhi High Court has held that a wife is not entitled to interim maintenance under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act for the period during which she was employed and earning.
Title: SOCIAL JURIST, A CIVIL RIGHTS GROUP v. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS
Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 881
The Delhi High Court has pulled up the National Highways Authority of India (NHAI), Delhi International Airport Limited (DIAL) and other agencies over the continuing waterlogging and traffic congestion in city's Mahipalpur area.
Dowry Demand For Setting Up Business Still 'Dowry' Under S. 304B IPC: Delhi High Court
Case title: Naveen Kumar Verma & Anr. v. State
Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 882
The Delhi High Court has held that a demand for money connected with the marital relationship does not cease to be a dowry demand merely because the money is sought for setting up a business rather than for personal use.
Title: VEER PAL v. STATE
Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 883
The Delhi High Court has observed that the society has failed to value and respect physical labour as labourers in the country are “least paid, least cared and least bothered.”
Case title: Nazre Alam @ Ravi & Anr v. State
Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 884
The Delhi High Court has held that a person cannot be convicted under Section 368 of the Indian Penal Code for wrongfully concealing or confining a kidnapped or abducted person unless the prosecution proves that the accused knew that the person had been kidnapped or abducted.
Title: KUNAL YADAV & ORS v. MANAN KUMAR MISHRA & ORS
Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 885
The Delhi High Court has rejected a plea seeking a CBI or other independent agency probe into an alleged assault on advocates inside and outside the Bar Council of India (BCI) premises in late August.
Title: Ghanshyam D. Uphadhyay v. Union of India & Ors.
Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 886
The Delhi High Court dismissed a plea seeking registration of FIR and investigation by CBI or SIT into the alleged unaccounted cash-at-home discovery during a fire incident at former Justice Yashwant Varma's residence.
Justice Amit Bansal dismissed the petition filed by advocate Ghanshyam Dayalu Upadhyay, calling it a “wild witch hunt.”
Complainant Can't Force Unwilling Accused To Undergo Narco Test: Delhi High Court
Case Title: Pappu Singh v. State NCT of Delhi
Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 887
The Delhi High Court has held that a complainant cannot seek to compel an accused who has expressly refused consent to undergo a Narco Analysis Test.
Justice Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav observed that consent is a personal and non-derogable safeguard available to the subject of the test.
Malviya Nagar Fire: Delhi High Court Grants Interim Bail To Hotel Owner On Medical Grounds
Title: LOVKESH BAJAJ v. STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI
Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 888
The Delhi High Court granted interim bail to Lavkesh Bajaj, the owner of the hotel building in Malviya Nagar where a devastating fire killed 21 people in June.
Title: ASHWIKA SINGHAL v. UNION OF INDIA THROUGH SECRETARY & ORS
Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 889
The Delhi High Court has prima facie held that the requirement of producing a legal guardianship certificate under the Guardians and Wards Act, 1890, for NEET-UG candidates seeking admission under the NRI quota does not apply to candidates who have already attained the age of 18 years.
Title: MUSKAN RATHI v. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS
Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 890
The Delhi High Court has held that courts cannot interfere with a decision to exclude an athlete from participation in a particular category which has been objectively taken by the authorities and subject experts.
Delhi High Court Finds Someone Added 'Interim Stay' Para To Its Order, Calls For Investigation
Title: SMT. MEENA DEVI AND ANR v. THE STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) AND ORS
Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 891
The Delhi High Court has flagged an apparent fabrication of one of its orders, observing that an unknown person seemed to have added the words “interim stay granted” in it.
Justice Purushaindra Kumarav was hearing a plea filed by one Meena Devi and another individual, alleging police inaction on their complaint concerning alleged fraud and forgery in an attempt to grab their property in city's Khera Khurd area.
Title: NINA PRASAD v. STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR
Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 892
The Delhi High Court has permitted a 64-year-old woman, accused in a 2021 abetment of suicide case, to temporarily take back her passport to travel to the United States for her son's engagement and court marriage.
Title: CBI v. Chitra Ramakrishna & other connected matter
Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 893
The Delhi High Court dismissed a plea filed by Central Bureau of Investigation challenging bail granted to former managing director and chief executive officer of the National Stock Exchange Chitra Ramkrishna in a case related to alleged illegal phone tapping of NSE employees.
Case Name : Anita v. Punjab and Sind Bank
Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 894
A Division Bench of the Delhi High Court comprising Chief Justice Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya and Justice Tejas Karia held that the compassionate appointment cannot be denied by treating family pension, terminal benefits, or notional interest on terminal benefits as family income. Such inclusion defeats the object of providing immediate financial assistance to the deceased employee's family.
Case Title: KAMLESH SHARMA v. NEETA BHARDWAJ & ORS
Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 895
The Delhi High Court has permitted four female heirs to exercise their rights to perform pooja sewa at city's Kalkaji Mandir by appointing male representatives from within their family.
Title: BSES YAMUNA POWER LIMITED v. MOHD. GULZAR & ANR
Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 896
The Delhi High Court has directed the BSES Yamuna Power Limited (BYPL), Delhi Fire Service and the Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD) to devise a procedure for obtaining Fire Safety Certificates for electricity connections, particularly in old buildings where connections are being denied on account of the buildings exceeding prescribed height limits.
Title: Ami Sisodia v. GNCTD & Ors
Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 897
The Delhi High Court asked the Delhi Government and Delhi Transport Corporation (DTC) to ensure that entire fleet of DTC buses ply on roads in the city providing the services to all.
Title: INDUS BIRRA BEVERAGES & ORS v. ISHAAN ASSOCIATES
Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 898
The Delhi High Court has waived costs of Rs. 50,000 imposed on a company while directing its counsel to distribute samosas and tea to all employees of the Delhi High Court Bar Association (DHCBA) within a week.
Title: Students' Federation of India & Anr v. Union of India & Anr
Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 899
The Delhi High Court asked the Central Government's Grievance Appellate Committee (GAC) to decide Students' Federation of India (SFI) appeal against permanent disabling of its official Instagram account.
Title: GURMEET SINGH @ HARPREET SINGH v. STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR
Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 900
The Delhi High Court has held that an accused's liberty cannot be made conditional upon fulfilment of a monetary settlement with the complainant, observing that a financial undertaking cannot be allowed to turn custody into a means of enforcing a monetary bargain.
Title: DR MANISH KAMRA v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS
Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 901
The Delhi High Court has held that the right to pursue higher education cannot be curtailed lightly, even though it is not declared as a fundamental right.
Delhi High Court Denies Anticipatory Bail To Ajeet Bharti In SC/ST Act Case
Case Title: Ajeet Bharti v. State
Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 902
The Delhi High Court denied anticipatory bail to commentator Ajeet Bharti in a case under Scheduled Caste Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act.
Justice Saurabh Banerjee while pronouncing the verdict, said that the offence under SC/ST Act was prima facie made out against Bharti.
POCSO Offence Can't Be Settled Through Compromise By Victim Or Her Family: Delhi High Court
Title: ANAND SINGH RAWAT v. THE STATE AND ANOTHER & ANR
Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 903
The Delhi High Court has held that an offence under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (POCSO Act) cannot be settled through a compromise between the accused and the child victim or her family.
Title: MASTER SHUBH CHOWDHARI THROUGH HIS FATHER v. EQUESTRIAN FEDERATION OF INDIA & ORS and other connected matter
Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 904
The Delhi High Court has directed the Equestrian Federation of India (EFI) to ensure that its selection criteria and timelines for future international sporting events are framed and implemented with sufficient clarity and precision.
A division bench comprising Chief Justice DK Upadhyaya and Justice Tejas Karia observed that ambiguity in the selection process can create avoidable uncertainty for athletes representing the country.
Title: M/S HITECH ENTERPRISES v. M/S MODERN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY DELHI
Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 905
The Delhi High Court has held that parties are entitled to a full refund of court fees when a suit, counter-claim or appeal is disposed of upon an amicable settlement.
Title: MASASASONG AO v. ED
Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 906
The Delhi High Court has observed that the seriousness of allegations in a predicate case under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act cannot, by itself, justify prolonged incarceration in a separate proceedings under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA).
Title: SUMIT SHAKYA v. STATEOFNCT OF DELHI & ANR
Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 907
The Delhi High Court has directed the District Legal Services Authority (DLSA) to print and hand over to a 10-year-old POCSO survivor a message penned by the trial court judge who had convicted the accused, along with the compensation awarded to her family.
Title: United Forum of Bank Unions Delhi State v. Union of India & Ors
Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 908
The Delhi High Court asked the Delhi Police to decide a plea filed by Delhi State unit of the United Forum of Bank Unions (UFBU) seeking permission to hold a peaceful protest at any alternate site other than Jantar Mantar on September 28, 29 and 30.
Title: RAJNISH GUPTA v. CBI & other connected matter
Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 909
The Delhi High Court has held that a condition, imposed while quashing a look-out circular (LOC), requiring an accused to obtain prior permission for every foreign visit cannot be sustained where the individual was never arrested during investigation, the chargesheet stands filed, cognizance has not been taken and there is no material showing any non-cooperation or default.
Title: X v. State NCT of Delhi & Ors
Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 910
The Delhi High Court granted police protection to a woman who has alleged that Cockroach Janta Party leaders Saurav Das, Abhijit Dipke, Ashutosh Ranka and Ratna Singh posted and circulated an alleged deepfake picture of her alongside PM Narendra Modi on social media pursuant to which she allegedly received threats.
Refusal To Permit Foreign Travel Must Not Impede Pregnant Foreigner's Medical Care: Delhi High Court
Title: SMT.SIMRAN KAUR v. STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI )
Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 911
The Delhi High Court has directed the police to ensure that its refusal to permit foreign travel to an Afghan national, who is carrying twins, does not obstruct or delay her access to appropriate antenatal, diabetic or other medical care.
Case title: Union Of India & Ors. v. Himanshi & 34 Ors
Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 912
The Delhi High Court has held that when authorities choose to cancel the candidature and penalise individual candidates for allegedly adopting unfair means in an examination, they must establish the allegation against each candidate individually and cannot adopt a “one size fits all” approach.
Case title: Equitas Small Finance Bank Ltd. v. Mrs Nirmala Bai Shanthilal & Ors
Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 913
The Delhi High Court has held that a litigant cannot resile from an order passed on the basis of submissions made by its counsel, observing that permitting such a course would create a “chaotic situation”.
Case title: Shahbuddin v. State
Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 914
The Delhi High Court has set aside a 2013 rape conviction of a man, after finding material inconsistencies in the prosecutrix's testimony and contradictions between her account and the medical, forensic and documentary evidence.
Case title: Anil Ahluwalia v. State NCT of Delhi
Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 915
The Delhi High Court has held that a party cannot ordinarily invoke its inherent powers under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) as a “backdoor entry” to challenge an order after having unsuccessfully exhausted the revisional remedy, unless the case involves grave miscarriage of justice.
Title: ASHISH ALIES VICKY v. STATE OF NCT OF DELHI
Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 916
The Delhi High Court has cautioned a jail warden against using unnecessary violence or beating inmates, observing that such conduct is impermissible, especially after a situation inside the prison has already been brought under control.
Case Title: Manoj Chaudhary v. State NCT of Delhi
Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 917
The Delhi High Court has held that re-arrest of an accused is illegal where the procedure mandated by the Supreme Court is not followed after his earlier release on account of violation of the constitutional safeguards under Article 22(1) of Constitution of India.
Title: AARTI KAKKAR & ORS v. DINESH MEHAN & ANR
Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 918
The Delhi High Court has held that unrecorded monetary assurances cannot be added to a concluded settlement merely on the basis of subsequent assertions, unless clear and cogent material establishes fraud, inducement or other circumstances vitiating the parties' consent.
Title: AYUSH KUMAR & ANR v. NATIONAL TESTING AGENCY & ORS and Other Connected Matters
Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 919
The Delhi High Court has directed the National Testing Agency (NTA) to issue duplicate NEET-UG scorecards to a batch of medical graduates who had misplaced or lost their original scorecards.
Victim Must Be Heard Before Granting Bail In Rape Case: Delhi High Court
Title: Ms G v. State NCT of Delhi & Anr
CITATION : 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 920
The Delhi High Court has held that a victim, who sets the criminal law in motion, is entitled to participate at every stage of criminal proceedings, including the hearing of an accused's regular bail application.
Custodial Interrogation Not Required Merely For Recovery Of Stridhan: Delhi High Court
Title: HARCHARAN SINGH BHALLA v. THE STATE GOVT. OF NCT DELHI
CITATION : 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 921
The Delhi High Court has held that custodial interrogation is not required merely for recovery of stridhan, observing that such recovery does not fall within the domain of the bail court and the complainant would have to initiate appropriate proceedings in accordance with law.
Title: LALIT PANDEY v. SANJAY AGARWAL
CITATION : 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 922
The Delhi High Court has stressed the need for expeditious disposal of cheque bouncing cases under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, observing that once a witness is available, his examination or cross-examination ought to take place on the same date.
Title: DR VIKAS DIVYAKIRTI v. META PLATFORMS INC & ORS
CITATION : 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 923
The Delhi High Court directed takedown of deepfake and impersonating content posted against founder of Drishti IAS coaching institute and former civil servant Vikas Divyakirti on social media.
Delhi High Court Fines Lawyer ₹1 Lakh For Appearing Virtually From Moving Car
Title: SOUTH INDIAN BANK LTD AND UNION BANK OF INDIA LTD. THROUGH SOUTH INDIAN BANK LTD. IN ITS CAPACITY AS THE LENDERS REPRESENTATIVE v. NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA
CITATION : 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 924
The Delhi High Court has imposed a cost of Rs. 1 lakh on a counsel after he appeared in a virtual hearing from a moving car, observing that the convenience offered by virtual hearings cannot come at the cost of court decorum or cause disturbance in the conduct of judicial proceedings.
Delhi High Court Sets Aside FSSAI Order Directing Red Bull To Stop Using “Energy Drink” Label
Title: Red Bull v. Union of India & Ors
CITATION : 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 925
The Delhi High Court set aside an order passed by the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI) directing Austrian beverage producer Red Bull to stop using the term “Energy Drink” for its caffeinated beverages.
AI-Generated Voice Claim: Delhi High Court Orders Forensic Examination Of Alleged Extortion Call
Title: BPTP LIMITED v. NITIN NARESH & ORS
CITATION : 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 926
The Delhi High Court has directed the Central Forensic Science Laboratory (CFSL) to conduct a scientific examination of an alleged phone recording submitted by real estate company BPTP Limited, after the defendant claimed that it could be an AI-generated voice clone.
Justice Tushar Rao Gedela passed the order while hearing an application filed by BPTP Limited alleging wilful disobedience of an earlier court order dated September 03.
Title: BISHMEET KAUR v. GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS
CITATION : 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 927
The Delhi High Court has observed that disability, by itself, can never be the sole ground to deny reproductive autonomy to a woman.
Justice Amit Mahajan made the observation while directing the Delhi Government to constitute an independent multidisciplinary Medical Board to examine whether a hysterectomy (surgical removal of the uterus) should be performed on a woman with disabilities.
Muslim Marriage No Defence To POCSO Act In Case Of Sex With Minor Wife: Delhi High Court
Case Title : Bilal & Anr v. The State Govt Of Nct Of Delhi Through Sho & Ors.
CITATION : 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 928
The Delhi High Court has held that a marriage recognised under Muslim personal law cannot confer immunity from prosecution under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (POCSO) or the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) for sexual intercourse with a wife who was below 18 years of age at the relevant time.
Case Title : M/S Mk Wholesale v. ICICI Bank Ltd. & Ors
CITATION : 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 929
The Delhi High Court has directed ICICI Bank to reverse a transaction of ₹3,89,981 which was inadvertently transferred by a business entity to a wrong beneficiary having a similar name.
Delhi High Court Denies Bail To Umar Khalid, Sharjeel Imam In Delhi Riots UAPA Case
Title: Umar Khalid v. State & other connected matter
CITATION : 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 930
The Delhi High Court denied the bail pleas filed by former JNU scholar Umar Khalid and Sharjeel Imam in the larger conspiracy case relating to the 2020 North East Delhi riots registered under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA).
A division bench comprising Justice Prathiba M Singh and Justice Dinesh Bhatt said that it cannot modify the order passed by the Supreme Court in Gulfisha Fatima case wherein conditions were imposed on them to seek bail— one, on completion of protected witness' examination and upon expiry of one year from passing order (January 05, 2026), whichever is earlier.
Title: VIJAY SHANKAR MEENA v. UNIVERSITY OF DELHI AND ORS
CITATION : 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 931
The Delhi High Court dismissed a plea challenging the results of the recently held Delhi University Students' Union (DUSU) elections over allegations of large-scale electoral malpractice and partisan campaigning by university officials in favour of the Akhil Bharatiya Vidyarthi Parishad (ABVP).
Title: Tahir Hussain v. State
CITATION : 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 932
The Delhi High Court allowed former Aam Aadmi Party councillor Tahir Hussain to seek documents relied upon by Delhi Police in two Delhi riots cases against him, for use in a third riots case in which he is currently facing trial.
Justice Sanjeev Narula quashed the trial court order which had rejected Hussain's application filed under Section 94 of BNSS to requisition the documents.
Case Title : Mahan Swatantrata Senani Lalti Ram Trust v. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS
CITATION : 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 933
The Delhi High Court refused to entertain a PIL seeking a dedicated memorial for the martyrs of the Indian National Army (INA) at city's Red Fort in recognition of their contribution and sacrifice in India's struggle for independence.
A division bench comprising of Chief Justice DK Upadhyaya and Justice Tejas Karia remarked that whether or not the memorial has to be erected at Red Fort is the discretion of the Government and Courts cannot interfere in the same.
Case Title : SHRI SANATAN DHARAM RAMLEELA SAMITI v. DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ORS
CITATION : 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 934
The Delhi High Court has held that the requirement of maintaining a park as a green and recreational space for the welfare of local residents must take precedence over its temporary use for conducting Ramlila.
Advocates Can't Apply For Multiple DLSA Panels/Districts; Delhi High Court Upholds Empanelment Rule
Case Title : SACHIN CHAUDHARY v. DELHI STATE LEGAL SERVICES AUTHORITY & ANR
CITATION : 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 935
The Delhi High Court has dismissed a plea challenging a Delhi State Legal Services Authority (DSLSA) condition restricting advocates from applying for empanelment in more than one District Legal Services Authority (DLSA) or panel.
Justice Amit Mahajan held that prescribing eligibility conditions and selection procedures primarily falls within the domain of the authority conducting the selection process.
Case Title : NAIM @MOHD. NAEEM v. NATIONAL INVESTIGATION AGENCY
CITATION : 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 936
The Delhi High Court has granted bail to a man accused of helping an alleged ISIS-linked terror module to procure weapons, observing that he has remained in custody for over seven-and-a-half years and there was no possibility of the trial concluding in the near future.
Delhi High Court Directs DDA To Process Pending Freehold Conversion Applications Within Two Months
Case Title : DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY v. MALA SAHNI SETH & ANR And other connected matters
CITATION : 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 937
The Delhi High Court has directed the Delhi Development Authority (DDA) to process all pending applications for conversion of properties from leasehold to freehold within two months, citing difficulties being faced by the residents of the national capital.
A Division Bench comprising Justice Prathiba M Singh and Justice Vikas Mahajan directed that all pending applications must be processed in accordance with the policy prevalent on the date of filing the applications.
Accused Can't Protract Trial And Later Cite Delay To Seek Bail: Delhi High Court
Case Title : Sanam Dagar v. State (NCT of Delhi)
CITATION : 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 938
The Delhi High Court has observed that accused persons cannot prolong their trials through their defence counsel and subsequently seek bail on the ground of prolonged incarceration, cautioning against the misuse of the legal process.