Allahabad High Court Annual Digest 2025 : Part II [Citations 301 - 590]

[SARFAESI Act] Limitation To Be Calculated From Date Of Last Action Against Which Aggrieved Party Approached DRT U/S 17: Allahabad High Court Case Title: Vimla Kashyap and Ors v. Union of India and Ors [MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No.3953 of 2025] Case citation : 2025 LiveLaw (AB) 301 The Allahabad High Court has held that limitation for filing securitization application under Section 17 of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 has to be calculated from the date on which last action occurred against which the aggrieved approached the Debt recovery Tribunal under Section 17. NCMEI Has Exclusive Power To Declare Minority Status Of Educational Institutions; 1999 GO Has Lost Relevance: Allahabad High Court Case title - Sharda University Thru. Registrar And Another vs. State Of U.P. Thru. Chief Secy. Lko And 3 Others 2025 LiveLaw (AB) 302 Case Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (AB) 302 The Allahabad High Court on Tuesday quashed an order of the UP Government rejecting Greater Noida-based Sharda University's request to be included in the list of colleges participating in the ongoing NEET Counselling. The rejection order, passed by the Director General of Medical Education and Training, Uttar Pradesh (DGME), was based on the fact that the minority status granted to the University was not in accordance with the Government Order dated August 28, 1999. Release Accused On 'Single' Surety; Don't Remand Them To Custody If Chargesheet Filed Sans Arrest: Allahabad HC Directs UP Courts Case title - Bacchi Devi vs. State of U.P. and Another 2025 LiveLaw (AB) 303 Case Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (AB) 303 The Allahabad High Court has issued a comprehensive set of directions for the trial courts across Uttar Pradesh to ensure uniform trial court practice, to give effect to the constitutional guarantees under Article 21 and to implement binding Supreme Court directions in this regard. Exercising its power under Article 227 of the Constitution and Section 528 BNSS, a bench of Justice Vinod Diwakar on Tuesday directed that in all cases where the chargesheet has been filed without arrest, whether because custodial interrogation was not affected during investigation or the accused had secured anticipatory bail/protective orders under Article 226 or Section 528 BNSS and duly cooperated, certain practices should be adopted across the state. Allahabad High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail To AMU Professor In FIR Over Alleged Reference To Rape In Hindu Mythology Case title - Dr Jitendra Kumar vs. State Of U.P. And 2 Others 2025 LiveLaw (AB) 304 Case Citation : 2025 LiveLaw (AB) 304 The Allahabad High Court recently granted anticipatory bail to an Aligarh Muslim University professor (Dr Jitendra Kumar) who is facing an FIR for allegedly referring to examples of 'rape' in Hindu mythology during a Forensic Medicine class in 2022. A bench of Justice Gautam Chowdhary granted him relief, taking into account the applicant's role and all the facts and circumstances of the case. Litigation Can't Be A Sport For Mischievous: Allahabad High Court Penalises 'Busybody' Lawyer, Directs Pro Bono Work In 5 Cases Case title - Sultan Choudhary vs. State Of U.P. And 2 Others 2025 LiveLaw (AB) 305 Case Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (AB) 305 In a sternly worded order, the Allahabad High Court dismissed a writ petition filed by an Advocate seeking a departmental enquiry against an Assistant Engineer of the Uttar Pradesh Jal Nigam, holding that the petition was 'actuated by malafides' and amounted to 'an abuse of the process of the Court'. As a penalty, a bench of Justice Ajay Bhanot directed him to assist the trial court in Gautam Budh Nagar in five cases on a pro bono basis. Proceedings For Maintenance Pendente Lite Maintainable Even At Revisional/Appellate Stage Under Hindu Marriage Act: Allahabad High Court Case Title: Ankit Suman v. State of U.P. and Another [MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 8704 of 2025] Case Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (AB) 306 The Allahabad High Court has held that proceedings under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 for maintenance pendente lite and expenses are maintainable even if the case under the Act is at revisional or appellate stage or if restoration application is pending in any such proceedings under the Act which have been dismissed in default. Justice Manish Kumar Nigam held “the proceedings under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 are maintainable during the pendency of the proceedings as contemplated under the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 and the liability to pay the amount will not come to an end merely because the proceedings are pending at the revisional stage, appellate stage or even in cases where the proceedings have been dismissed for want of prosecution and the restoration of the same is pending.” ...

Allahabad High Court Annual Digest 2025 : Part II [Citations 301 - 590]

LIVELAW NEWS NETWORK

Tags