Delhi High Court Annual Digest 2025: Part IV [Citations 1351 - 1804]

Citations 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1351 to 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1804Victims Of False Police Complaint Can Institute Proceedings U/S 211 IPC, Bar Under S.195 CrPC Won't Apply: Delhi High CourtCase title: Sunair Hotels Ltd. v. State & Anr.Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1351The Delhi High Court has held that a private individual who is falsely accused in a police complaint can himself initiate proceedings against the accused under Section 211 IPC, without having to get the action initiated by the court.Company Court Can't Shield Guarantors From Recovery Proceedings Once Liquidation Attains Finality: Delhi High CourtCase title: PC Jhalani & Ors v. Jhalani Tools (India) Ltd & OrsCitation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1352The Delhi High Court has made it clear that once a final winding up order has been passed against a Company and the Official Liquidator has taken charge, the Company Court is not required to come to the aid of guarantors so as to shield them from recovery proceedings initiated by creditors.Delhi High Court Upholds UIDAI Decision To Diqualify 'Abnormally Low' Financial Bid From Tender For Aadhaar Audit & Quality CheckCase title: Writer Business Services Pvt. Ltd v. UIDAICitation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1353The Delhi High Court has refused to interfere with UIDAI's decision to reject the lowest financial bid submitted by Writer Business Services Pvt. Ltd for audit and quality check of Aadhar applications.Delhi High Court Orders Take Down Of Alleged Deepfake Video On Taj Lake Palace UdaipurCase title: The Indian Hotels Company Limited v. John Doe & Anr.Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1354The Delhi High Court ordered take down of an alleged AI generated deepfake video, alleging poisoning of guests by employees of the renowned hotel Taj Lake Palace in Udaipur.Delhi High Court Dismisses Income Tax Dept's Appeals Against Remfry & Sagar Law Firm Over Goodwill License FeesCase title: Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Remfry And SagarCitation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1355The Delhi High Court has upheld an order of the ITAT allowing IPR law firm Remfry & Sagar to treat the license fees paid by it to acquire its founder's goodwill, as a business expense deductible under Section 37 of the Income Tax Act.Delhi High Court Dismisses PIL Seeking Public Access To City's CCTV FootageCase title: Save India Foundation v. GNCTDCitation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1356The Delhi High Court dismissed a PIL seeking to make Delhi's CCTV footage public.The plea filed by Save India Foundation sought directions to the Delhi Police to upload and share the CCTV feed from the cameras installed by the Delhi Government on a public domain, in a time bound manner.S.63 Contract Act | Creditor Can't Insist On Balance Payment After Accepting Lesser Sum In Satisfaction Of Claim: Delhi High CourtCase title: M/S B S Enviro N Infracon Private Limited v. Vij Contracts Pvt. Ltd.Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1357The Delhi High Court has held that it is inequitable of a creditor to demand balance payment after accepting a lesser sum towards satisfaction of a claim.Medical Sales Representative Is Not 'Workman' Under Industrial Disputes Act: Delhi High CourtCase title: Sh. Samarendra Das v. M/S Win Medicare Pvt. Ltd.Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1358The Delhi High Court has held that a medical sales representative, who has received specialized training for his field of work, cannot be categorised as a 'workman' under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.Chargesheet Without Prior Approval Of Disciplinary Authority Is Void Ab Initio; Can't Be Ratified Later: Delhi HCCase Name : Union of India Through Secretary & Ors. vs. S K JasraCitation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1359A Division bench of the Delhi High Court comprising Justice Navin Chawla and Justice Madhu Jain held that a chargesheet issued without the prior approval of the competent disciplinary authority under Rule 14(3) of the CCS (CCA) Rules, 1965 is void ab initio, non-existent in law. Further it cannot be validated by subsequent ratification.Delhi High Court Restrains Entity From Infringing Tata's Vivanta TrademarkCase title: The Indian Hotels Company Limited v. Vivanta StaysCitation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1360The Delhi High Court has restrained an entity from infringing the trademark of Tata Group's Indian Hotels Company Limited which runs and operates hotel brand 'Vivanta'.FERA | ED Can Seize Indian Currency Intended For Illegal Purchase Of Foreign Exchange: Delhi High CourtCase title: Arjun Patil v. UOICitation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1361The Delhi High Court has made it clear that Indian currency can be seized by the Enforcement Directorate under provisions of the erstwhile Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973, if the same is intended to be used for illegal purchase of foreign exchange.Unsigned GST Demand Order Valid If Accompanied By DRC-07 Bearing Officer's Details: Delhi High CourtCase title: Future Consumer Limited v. UOICitation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1362The Delhi High Court has held that an unsigned GST demand order is valid, if...

Delhi High Court Annual Digest 2025: Part IV [Citations 1351 - 1804]

Nupur Thapliyal

Tags