Sabarimala Reference : Live Updates From Supreme Court Hearing [Day 9]

LIVELAW NEWS NETWORK

28 April 2026 10:41 AM IST

  • Sabarimala Reference : Live Updates From Supreme Court Hearing [Day 9]
    Listen to this Article

    Today is the ninth day of arguments before the 9-judge bench of the Supreme Court in the Sabarimala reference.

    Apart from CJI Surya Kant, the Bench comprises Justice BV Nagarathna, Justice MM Sundresh, Justice Ahsanuddin Amanullah, Justice Aravind Kumar, Justice Augustine George Masih, Justice Prasanna B Varale, Justice R Mahadevan and Justice Joymalya Bagchi.

    Sabarimala Reference | Never Understood What Transformative Constitutionalism Is : Solicitor General Questions 'Constitutional Morality'

    How Can Non-Devotees Of Lord Ayyappa Challenge Sabarimala Custom? Supreme Court Asks

    Sabarimala Reference | Judicial Review Over Superstitious Practices Not Barred, Says Supreme Court In Hearing

    Sabarimala Reference | Centre Questions Verdicts Decriminalising Adultery & Homosexuality For Applying 'Constitutional Morality'

    Reports from Day 3 Hearing are given below :

    Excluding Other Denominations From Temples Will Affect Hinduism : Supreme Court In Sabarimala Reference Hearing

    Sampradayas Attached To Temple Must Be Followed While Visiting It: Supreme Court In Sabarimala Reference Hearing

    There Are Temples Where Only Women Can Go : Centre To Supreme Court In Sabarimala Reference

    Reports from Day 4 Hearing are given below :

    Difficult To Declare Belief Of Millions Wrong : Supreme Court In Sabarimala Reference Hearing

    Sabarimala Reference | Can't Hollow Out Religion In The Name Of Social Reform, Supreme Court Says In Hearing

    Live Updates

    • 28 April 2026 12:38 PM IST

      Advocate: establish and maintain must be read conjuctively.

    • 28 April 2026 12:38 PM IST

      Advocates: article 26- two parts-establish and maintain-AMU judgment-maintain means continue, dictationary meaning also continue. in accordance with article 25, I can continue unless religious cruelty.

    • 28 April 2026 12:37 PM IST

      Advocate: two judges decided on the basis of menstruation, lots of devotees are pained.

    • 28 April 2026 12:37 PM IST

      Advocate: article 25(2)(b)-whether any cruetly involved in sabarimala? a section of people said that menstruating women can't enter-it is an interpretation given by some activist, it is wrong.

    • 28 April 2026 12:36 PM IST

      Advocate: if this rituals and customs has nothing to do with religious cruelty, as J Malhotra said, then the scope of judicial review is very less. this is a dissenting judgment.

      what is religious cruelty? [reads his written submissions]

    • 28 April 2026 12:19 PM IST

      J Mahadevan: you are going beyond the subject, don't go into all those areas

      Upadhyay: entire world is burning due to religious conflict

      CJI: time is over mr upadhyay

      Upadhyay: article 25 is subject to all other rights and article 26 doesn't confer right to propagate. article 26 is implied subject to other provisions. there are lakhs of mosque and churches, but some have distinct sanctity. similarly sabarimala has 1500 temples but this has distinct sanctity.

    • 28 April 2026 12:12 PM IST

      Upadhyay: anti-conversion laws are based on premise that only individuals can practice. the root cause of 1847 conflict was denomination v denomination.

    • 28 April 2026 12:12 PM IST

      Adv Ashwini Upadhyay: mylords oath is to uphold the constitution-upholding the constitution has higher value. bharat has been divided in 25 pieces due to denominational conflicts and bharat has also been divided into 7 countries.

      what will have if mylords accepts senior arguments, whether in 25 years will be become scientifically developed countries like China or countries like Pakistan or Afghanistan.

      articles 25 and 26 is the most restricted- those countries where we took these rights have not given the religion to denomination. my submission is, article 26 is the species and 25 is the genesis.

    • 28 April 2026 12:01 PM IST

      Sr Adv: article 26 is complementary to article 25, and the latter can't supersede. reads Menaka Gandhi on the proportionality principle- expand the reach of fundamental rights.

      temple is a sovereign place itself and has its unique feature. mylords are not going into each facts but you will have to determine where to strike a balance between articles 25 and 26.

    • 28 April 2026 11:59 AM IST

      Sr Adv: i am on the historical part of the temple- the applicant is from SC/ST and has been given right to entry- all these judgments provide that the sovereign of the deity. article 26 protects rights of deity and all that have to be protected.

      reads TMA Pai.

    Next Story